A strategy for selection of reference materials in stable oxygen isotope analyses of solid materials

Abstract

The propagation of uncertainties associated with the stable oxygen isotope reference materials through a multi-point normalisation procedure was evaluated in this study using Monte Carlo (MC) simulation. We quantified the normalisation error for a particular selection of reference materials and their number of replicates, when the choice of standards is restricted to either nitrates, sulphates or organic reference materials alone, and in comparison with when this restriction was relaxed. A lower uncertainty in stable oxygen isotope analyses of solid materials performed using High-Temperature Pyrolysis (HTP) can be readily achieved through an optimal selection of reference materials. Among the currently available certified reference materials the best performing pairs minimising the normalisation errors are USGS35 and USGS34 for nitrates; IAEA-SO-6 and IAEA-SO-5 for sulphates; and IAEA-601 and IAEA-602 for organic materials. The normalisation error can be reduced further--by approximately half--if each of these two analysed reference materials is replicated four times. The overall optimal selection among all nine considered reference materials is the IAEA-602 and IAEA-SO-6 pair. If each of these two reference materials is replicated four times the maximum predicted normalisation error will equal 0.22‰, the minimum normalisation error 0.12‰, and the mean normalisation error 0.15‰ over the natural range of δ(18)O variability. We argue that the proposed approach provides useful insights into reference material selection and in assessing the propagation of analytical error through normalisation procedures in stable oxygen isotope studies.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 20 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.