Article2012

A Review Study of Risk-Return Relationship and Performance Measures Comparing Different Industry Sectors

Hussein Abedi Shamsabadi · Mohammad Nourani Dargiri · Devinaga Rasiah

20 citations0/0 files storedGriffith Research Online

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Financial Markets and Investment Strategies Financial Analysis and Corporate Governance Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling

Abstract

The significance of risk-return relationship is advocated from both investors and organizations. Evaluating the relationship between expected rate of return and the risk of asset would help investors to make better and more accurate decision on investing in different industries. To this regards, the study reviewed the risk-return relationship and pricing methods, theories and empirical studies to develop a performance measures comparing different industry sectors. The empirical evidences were discussed within the scope of market risks and returns. Then, the theories and pioneer literature related to Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) was explored to show the relationship between expected return and systematic risk. Treynor Index, Sharpe Index, and Jansen Index as performance measures were extracted from CAPM model and the correlation were discussed between them. As of outcome, the study proposed a risk-return construct regards to develop better performance measures for industry sectors.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 20 citations exist upstream.

References

1964CAPITAL ASSET PRICES: A THEORY OF MARKET EQUILIBRIUM UNDER CONDITIONS OF RISK*1992The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns 1973Risk, Return, and Equilibrium: Empirical Tests 1975THE VALUATION OF RISK ASSETS AND THE SELECTION OF RISKY INVESTMENTS IN STOCK PORTFOLIOS AND CAPITAL BUDGETS**This paper is another in a series of interrelated theoretical and statistical studies of corporate financial and investment policies being made under grants from the Rockefeller Foundation, and more recently the Ford Foundation, to the Harvard Business School. The generous support for this work is most gratefully acknowledged. The author is also much indebted to his colleagues Professors Bishop, Christenson, Kahr, Raiffa, and (especially) Schlaifer, for extensive discussion and commentary on an earlier draft of this paper; but responsibility for any errors or imperfections remains strictly his own.[Professor Sharpe's paper, “Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium Under Conditions of Risk” (Journal of Finance, September 1964) appeared after this paper was in final form and on its way to the printers. My first section, which parallels the first half of his paper (with corresponding conclusions), sets the algebraic framework for sections II, III and VI, (which have no counterpart in his paper) and for section IV on the equilibrium prices of risk assets, concerning which our results differ significantly for reasons which will be explored elsewhere. Sharpe does not take up the capital budgeting problem developed in section V below.]2001The theory and practice of corporate finance: evidence from the field 1981The relationship between return and market value of common stocks 1959Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investments 1966Equilibrium in a Capital Asset Market

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.