Methods Guide for Medical Test ReviewsStephanie Chang, David Bruce Matchar, Gerald W. Smetana, Craig A. Umscheid2012-06-01article89 citationsclosedNo readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality ControlClinical practice guidelines implementationAbstractNo abstract was published for this record.Citations in this libraryStored only when both papers are in the corpus — 89 citations exist upstream.References2009AHRQ Series Paper 5: Grading the strength of a body of evidence when comparing medical interventions—Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and the Effective Health-Care Program2006When Is Measuring Sensitivity and Specificity Sufficient To Evaluate a Diagnostic Test, and When Do We Need Randomized Trials?2005Better Information for Better Health Care: The Evidence-based Practice Center Program and the Agency for Healthcare Research and QualityCited by2012Chapter 1: Introduction to the Methods Guide for Medical Test Reviews2020Assessing context suitability (generalizability, external validity, applicability or transferability) of findings in evidence syntheses in healthcare—An integrative review of methodological guidance2012Chapter 6: Assessing Applicability of Medical Test Studies in Systematic Reviews2015Development of an algorithm to provide awareness in choosing study designs for inclusion in systematic reviews of healthcare interventions: a method study2014The refinement of topics for systematic reviews: lessons and recommendations from the Effective Health Care Program2014Incorporating quality assessments of primary studies in the conclusions of diagnostic accuracy reviews: a cross-sectional study2019Guidance from key organisations on exploring, confirming and interpreting subgroup effects of medical treatments: a scoping review