Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Peer review in the assessment and funding of research by the Australian Research Council

7 references·2 citing·40 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1991The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation502 cited
2002The peer‐review process206 cited
1977Peer Review and the Support of Science139 cited
1989The Peer Review Process Used to Evaluate Manuscripts Submitted to Academic Journals120 cited
1981Interjudgmental reliability of reviews for the Journal of Educational Psychology.89 cited
1998Peer review and panel decisions in the assessment of Australian Research Council project grant applicants: what counts in a highly competitive context?38 cited
1992The research grant application process. Learning from failure?22 cited

Cited by

2011Scientific peer review594 cited
2007Peer review process: Assessments by applicant-nominated referees are biased, inflated, unreliable and invalid35 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work