The Impact of Socioeconomic Status on the Utilization of Spinal Imaging

Adeeb Derakhshan · Jacob A. Miller · Daniel Lubelski · Amy S. Nowacki · Brian J. Wells · Alex Milinovich +3 more

35 citations0/0 files storedNeurosurgery

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Health disparities and outcomes Healthcare Policy and Management Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Few studies have examined the general correlation between socioeconomic status and imaging. This study is the first to analyze this relationship in the spine patient population. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of socioeconomic status on the frequency with which imaging studies of the lumbar spine are ordered and completed. METHODS: Patients that were diagnosed with lumbar radiculopathy and/or myelopathy and had at least 1 subsequent lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), or X-ray ordered were retrospectively identified. Demographic information and the number of ordered and completed imaging studies were among the data collected. Patient insurance status and income level (estimated based on zip code) served as representations of socioeconomic status. RESULTS: A total of 24,105 patients met the inclusion criteria for this study. Regression analyses demonstrated that uninsured patients were significantly less likely to have an MRI, CT, or X-ray study ordered (P < .001 for all modalities) and completed (P < .001 for MRI and X-ray, P = .03 for CT). Patients with lower income had higher rates of MRI, CT, and X-ray (P < .001 for all) imaging ordered but were less likely to have an ordered X-ray be completed (P = .009). There was no significant difference in the completion rate of ordered MRIs or CTs. CONCLUSION: Disparities in image utilization based on socioeconomic characteristics such as insurance status and income level highlight a critical gap in access to health care. Physicians should work to mitigate the influence of such factors when deciding whether to order imaging studies, especially in light of the ongoing shift in health policy in the United States.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 35 citations exist upstream.

References

2005Social determinants of health inequalities 2008Socioeconomic Inequalities in Health in 22 European Countries 1997Measuring Social Class in US Public Health Research: Concepts, Methodologies, and Guidelines 2002Socioeconomic Disparities In Health: Pathways And Policies 2002Geocoding and Monitoring of US Socioeconomic Inequalities in Mortality and Cancer Incidence: Does the Choice of Area-based Measure and Geographic Level Matter?: The Public Health Disparities Geocoding Project 2005Socioeconomic differences in the prevalence of common chronic diseases: an overview of eight European countries 2013Understanding Why Patients Of Low Socioeconomic Status Prefer Hospitals Over Ambulatory Care 2009Health Consequences of Uninsurance among Adults in the United States: Recent Evidence and Implications

Cited by

2019Combining Nonclinical Determinants of Health and Clinical Data for Research and Evaluation: Rapid Review

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.