S
Study
Academic Library
Search
Shelves
Open access
My library
Review
George A. Wells · Study
Home
/
Author
George A. Wells
49 works
· latest 2023
· 4 institutions
cluster: provisional
ORCID 0000-0002-2289-9139
Works
49 shown
Improving social justice in observational studies: protocol for the development of a global and Indigenous STROBE-equity reporting guideline
International Journal for Equity in Health
·
2023
·
66 authors
·
Open access
42
citations
Guidance for using artificial intelligence for title and abstract screening while conducting knowledge syntheses
BMC Medical Research Methodology
·
2021
·
8 authors
·
Open access
104
citations
An evaluation of DistillerSR’s machine learning-based prioritization tool for title/abstract screening – impact on reviewer-relevant outcomes
BMC Medical Research Methodology
·
2020
·
6 authors
·
Open access
139
citations
When to replicate systematic reviews of interventions: consensus checklist
BMJ
·
2020
·
55 authors
·
review
·
Open access
109
citations
Rapid review methods more challenging during COVID-19: commentary with a focus on 8 knowledge synthesis steps
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
·
2020
·
22 authors
·
Open access
118
citations
Reporting of health equity considerations in cluster and individually randomized trials
Trials
·
2020
·
21 authors
·
Open access
52
citations
Journal impact factor, trial effect size, and methodological quality appear scantly related: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Systematic Reviews
·
2020
·
7 authors
·
review
·
Open access
39
citations
Including non‐randomized studies on intervention effects
·
2019
·
6 authors
·
other
166
citations
Agreement between the Cochrane risk of bias tool and Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale: A meta-epidemiological study of randomized controlled trials of physical therapy interventions
PLoS ONE
·
2019
·
7 authors
·
Open access
175
citations
The use of social media among health professionals to facilitate chronic disease self-management with their patients: A systematic review
Digital Health
·
2018
·
8 authors
·
review
·
Open access
61
citations
AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both
BMJ
·
2017
·
11 authors
·
review
·
Open access
10,605
citations
Quasi-experimental study designs series—paper 6: risk of bias assessment
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
·
2017
·
8 authors
·
review
·
Open access
97
citations
ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions
BMJ
·
2016
·
35 authors
·
Open access
20,225
citations
Network meta-analysis incorporating randomized controlled trials and non-randomized comparative cohort studies for assessing the safety and effectiveness of medical treatments: challenges and opportunities
Systematic Reviews
·
2015
·
9 authors
·
Open access
142
citations
Optimal Strategies for Reporting Pain in Clinical Trials and Systematic Reviews: Recommendations from an OMERACT 12 Workshop
The Journal of Rheumatology
·
2015
·
15 authors
·
review
·
Open access
157
citations
A Microsoft-Excel-based tool for running and critically appraising network meta-analyses—an overview and application of NetMetaXL
Systematic Reviews
·
2014
·
7 authors
·
Open access
209
citations
Developing Core Outcome Measurement Sets for Clinical Trials: OMERACT Filter 2.0
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
·
2014
·
15 authors
·
Open access
781
citations
The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses
·
2014
·
1 author
17,633
citations
Updated Method Guidelines for Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group Systematic Reviews and Metaanalyses
The Journal of Rheumatology
·
2013
·
13 authors
·
review
·
Open access
151
citations
Non‐randomized studies as a source of complementary, sequential or replacement evidence for randomized controlled trials in systematic reviews on the effects of interventions
Research Synthesis Methods
·
2013
·
9 authors
·
review
·
Open access
248
citations
Checklists of methodological issues for review authors to consider when including non‐randomized studies in systematic reviews
Research Synthesis Methods
·
2013
·
6 authors
·
review
141
citations
Issues relating to selective reporting when including non‐randomized studies in systematic reviews on the effects of healthcare interventions
Research Synthesis Methods
·
2013
·
8 authors
36
citations
An introduction to methodological issues when including non‐randomised studies in systematic reviews on the effects of interventions
Research Synthesis Methods
·
2013
·
6 authors
·
review
112
citations
Issues relating to selective reporting when including non‐randomized studies in systematic reviews on the effects of healthcare interventions
Research Synthesis Methods
·
2012
·
8 authors
·
review
50
citations
Issues relating to study design and risk of bias when including non‐randomized studies in systematic reviews on the effects of interventions
Research Synthesis Methods
·
2012
·
8 authors
·
review
183
citations
Does Consideration and Assessment of Effects on Health Equity Affect the Conclusions of Systematic Reviews? A Methodology Study
PLoS ONE
·
2012
·
10 authors
·
review
·
Open access
50
citations
How effects on health equity are assessed in systematic reviews of interventions
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
·
2010
·
11 authors
·
review
·
Open access
85
citations
Evidence-based discussion increases childhood vaccination uptake: a randomised cluster controlled trial of knowledge translation in Pakistan
BMC International Health and Human Rights
·
2009
·
9 authors
·
Open access
106
citations
STrengthening the REporting of Genetic Association Studies (STREGA)—an extension of the STROBE statement
Genetic Epidemiology
·
2009
·
30 authors
·
Open access
344
citations
STrengthening the REporting of Genetic Association studies (STREGA) – an extension of the STROBE statement
European Journal of Clinical Investigation
·
2009
·
30 authors
·
Open access
327
citations
AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
·
2009
·
8 authors
·
review
·
Open access
1,756
citations
Strengthening the reporting of genetic association studies (STREGA)—an extension of the strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
·
2009
·
30 authors
104
citations
Strengthening the reporting of genetic association studies (STREGA): an extension of the STROBE Statement
Human Genetics
·
2009
·
30 authors
·
Open access
183
citations
STrengthening the REporting of Genetic Association Studies (STREGA)— An Extension of the STROBE Statement
PLoS Medicine
·
2009
·
30 authors
·
Open access
805
citations
Strengthening the reporting of genetic association studies (STREGA): an extension of the STROBE statement
European Journal of Epidemiology
·
2009
·
30 authors
·
review
·
Open access
67
citations
Is health equity considered in systematic reviews of the cochrane musculoskeletal group?
Arthritis Care & Research
·
2008
·
13 authors
·
review
46
citations
Including Non‐Randomized Studies
·
2008
·
4 authors
·
other
308
citations
Generic quality-of-life assessment in rheumatoid arthritis.
PubMed
·
2007
·
2 authors
213
citations
Minimal clinically important improvement and patient acceptable symptom state for subjective outcome measures in rheumatic disorders.
PubMed
·
2007
·
9 authors
·
Open access
195
citations
Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews
BMC Medical Research Methodology
·
2007
·
10 authors
·
review
·
Open access
4,376
citations
Method guidelines for Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group systematic reviews.
PubMed
·
2006
·
6 authors
·
other
103
citations
Scope for improvement in the quality of reporting of systematic reviews. From the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group.
PubMed
·
2006
·
8 authors
·
Open access
41
citations
Many faces of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID): a literature review and directions for future research
Current Opinion in Rheumatology
·
2002
·
3 authors
·
review
514
citations
Looking for important change/differences in studies of responsiveness. OMERACT MCID Working Group. Outcome Measures in Rheumatology. Minimal Clinically Important Difference.
PubMed
·
2001
·
8 authors
235
citations
An Assessment of Methods to Combine Published Survival Curves
Medical Decision Making
·
2000
·
2 authors
67
citations
Users' Guides to the Medical Literature
JAMA
·
1999
·
5 authors
177
citations
Assessing the Quality of Randomized Trials
Controlled Clinical Trials
·
1999
·
7 authors
649
citations
A proposal for structured reporting of randomized controlled trials. The Standards of Reporting Trials Group
JAMA
·
1994
·
26 authors
90
citations
Osteoarthritis antirheumatic drug trials. I. Effects of standardization procedures on observer dependent outcome measures.
PubMed
·
1991
·
4 authors
50
citations