Does Consideration and Assessment of Effects on Health Equity Affect the Conclusions of Systematic Reviews? A Methodology Study

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Tackling health inequities both within and between countries remains high on the agenda of international organizations including the World Health Organization and local, regional and national governments. Systematic reviews can be a useful tool to assess effects on equity in health status because they include studies conducted in a variety of settings and populations. This study aims to describe the extent to which the impacts of health interventions on equity in health status are considered in systematic reviews, describe methods used, and assess the implications of their equity related findings for policy, practice and research. METHODS: We conducted a methodology study of equity assessment in systematic reviews. Two independent reviewers extracted information on the reporting and analysis of impacts of health interventions on equity in health status in a group of 300 systematic reviews collected from all systematic reviews indexed in one month of MEDLINE, using a pre-tested data collection form. Any differences in data extraction were resolved by discussion. RESULTS: Of the 300 systematic reviews, 224 assessed the effectiveness of interventions on health outcomes. Of these 224 reviews, 29 systematic reviews assessed effects on equity in health status using subgroup analysis or targeted analyses of vulnerable populations. Of these, seven conducted subgroup analyses related to health equity which were reported in insufficient detail to judge their credibility. Of these 29 reviews, 18 described implications for policy and practice based on assessment of effects on health equity. CONCLUSION: The quality and completeness of reporting should be enhanced as a priority, because without this policymakers and practitioners will continue lack the evidence base they need to inform decision-making about health inequity. Furthermore, there is a need to develop methods to systematically consider impacts on equity in health status that is currently lacking in systematic reviews.

Cite this

Vivian Andrea Welch, Mark Patrick Petticrew, Erin Ueffing, Maria Benkhalti Jandu, Kevin Brand, Bharbhoor Dhaliwal, … Peter Tugwell (2012). Does Consideration and Assessment of Effects on Health Equity Affect the Conclusions of Systematic Reviews? A Methodology Study. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031360

@article{andrea2012does,
  title  = {Does Consideration and Assessment of Effects on Health Equity Affect the Conclusions of Systematic Reviews? A Methodology Study},
  author = {Welch, Vivian Andrea and Petticrew, Mark Patrick and Ueffing, Erin and Jandu, Maria Benkhalti and Brand, Kevin and Dhaliwal, Bharbhoor and Kristjansson, Elizabeth and Smylie, Janet K. and Wells, George A. and Tugwell, Peter},
  year   = {2012},
  journal = {PLoS ONE},
  doi    = {10.1371/journal.pone.0031360}
}

Citations in this library

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 50 citations exist upstream.

References