S
Zodix
Study
Academic Library
Search
Dashboard
Shelves
Open access
My library
Inbox
Notes
Write
Learn
Alerts
More
Ask your library
Notifications
Quick cite
Review
Search or jump to…
⌘K
Daniel E. Ho · Study
Home
/
Author
Daniel E. Ho
29 works
· latest 2025
· 3 institutions
cluster: provisional
ORCID 0000-0002-2195-5469
Follow
Suggest an ORCID correction
h-index
22
i10
27
Citations
5,503
Works here
29
02
05
08
09
10
12
13
17
20
21
22
23
24
25
Most cited in this library
On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models
2021 · 2,670 citations
Advances, challenges and opportunities in creating data for trustworthy AI
2022 · 561 citations
Large Legal Fictions: Profiling Legal Hallucinations in Large Language Models
2024 · 326 citations
Government by Algorithm: Artificial Intelligence in Federal Administrative Agencies
2020 · 262 citations
Hallucination‐Free? Assessing the Reliability of Leading AI Legal Research Tools
2025 · 174 citations
Works
29 shown
Advancing science- and evidence-based AI policy
Science
·
2025
·
20 authors
·
Open access
22
citations
Hallucination‐Free? Assessing the Reliability of Leading AI Legal Research Tools
Journal of Empirical Legal Studies
·
2025
·
6 authors
·
Open access
174
citations
Considerations for governing open foundation models
Science
·
2024
·
9 authors
31
citations
Not (Officially) in My Backyard
Journal of the American Planning Association
·
2024
·
4 authors
·
Open access
5
citations
Large Legal Fictions: Profiling Legal Hallucinations in Large Language Models
The Journal of Legal Analysis
·
2024
·
4 authors
·
Open access
326
citations
The Bureaucratic Challenge to AI Governance: An Empirical Assessment of Implementation at U.S. Federal Agencies
Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society
·
2023
·
3 authors
·
other
·
Open access
24
citations
Legalbench: A Collaboratively Built Benchmark for Measuring Legal Reasoning in Large Language Models
SSRN Electronic Journal
·
2023
·
39 authors
·
preprint
·
Open access
154
citations
LegalBench: A Collaboratively Built Benchmark for Measuring Legal Reasoning in Large Language Models
neural information processing systems
·
2023
·
40 authors
·
other
89
citations
Advances, challenges and opportunities in creating data for trustworthy AI
Nature Machine Intelligence
·
2022
·
7 authors
561
citations
Outsider Oversight: Designing a Third Party Audit Ecosystem for AI Governance
Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society
·
2022
·
4 authors
·
other
·
Open access
129
citations
Algorithmic Fairness and Vertical Equity: Income Fairness with IRS Tax Audit Models
ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT)
·
2022
·
5 authors
·
other
·
Open access
27
citations
On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models
arXiv (Cornell University)
·
2021
·
98 authors
·
preprint
·
Open access
2,670
citations
When does pretraining help?
International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law
·
2021
·
5 authors
·
other
·
Open access
149
citations
Leveraging Administrative Data for Bias Audits
ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT)
·
2021
·
6 authors
·
other
·
Open access
21
citations
Leveraging Administrative Data for Bias Audits: Assessing Disparate Coverage with Mobility Data for COVID-19 Policy
arXiv (Cornell University)
·
2020
·
6 authors
·
preprint
·
Open access
76
citations
Improving Scientific Judgments in Law and Government: A Field Experiment of Patent Peer Review
Journal of Empirical Legal Studies
·
2020
·
2 authors
·
Open access
10
citations
Government by Algorithm: Artificial Intelligence in Federal Administrative Agencies
SSRN Electronic Journal
·
2020
·
4 authors
·
preprint
·
Open access
262
citations
Algorithmic Accountability in the Administrative State
bepress Legal Repository
·
2020
·
2 authors
·
Open access
54
citations
Managing Street-Level Arbitrariness: The Evidence Base for Public Sector Quality Improvement
Annual Review of Law and Social Science
·
2017
·
2 authors
·
review
·
Open access
9
citations
Does Peer Review Work? an Experiment of Experimentalism
Stanford Law Review
·
2017
·
1 author
44
citations
Introduction: The Empirical Revolution in Law
Stanford Law Review
·
2013
·
2 authors
18
citations
Fudging the Nudge: Information Disclosure and Restaurant Grading
bepress Legal Repository
·
2012
·
1 author
·
Open access
67
citations
Did a Switch in Time Save Nine?
The Journal of Legal Analysis
·
2010
·
2 authors
·
Open access
33
citations
"How Not to Lie with Judicial Votes: Misconceptions, Measurement, and Models"
eYLS (Yale Law School)
·
2010
·
1 author
·
Open access
63
citations
Did Liberal Justices Invent the Standing Doctrine? An Empirical Study of the Evolution of Standing, 1921-2006
SSRN Electronic Journal
·
2009
·
2 authors
·
preprint
·
Open access
17
citations
Measuring Explicit Political Positions of Media
Quarterly Journal of Political Science
·
2008
·
2 authors
139
citations
Estimating Causal Effects of Ballot Order from a Randomized Natural Experiment
Public Opinion Quarterly
·
2008
·
2 authors
154
citations
The Supreme Court During Crisis: How War Affects only Non-War Cases
Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University)
·
2005
·
4 authors
·
Open access
78
citations
Compliance and International Soft Law: Why Do Countries Implement the Basle Accord?
Journal of International Economic Law
·
2002
·
1 author
97
citations