S
Study
Academic Library
Search
Shelves
Open access
My library
Review
Patrick M. Bossuyt · Study
Home
/
Author
Patrick M. Bossuyt
103 works
· latest 2025
· 11 institutions
cluster: provisional
ORCID 0000-0003-4427-0128
Works
60 shown
The STARD-AI reporting guideline for diagnostic accuracy studies using artificial intelligence
Nature Medicine
·
2025
·
43 authors
·
Open access
389
citations
Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies Using AI (QUADAS-AI): Protocol for a Qualitative Study
JMIR Research Protocols
·
2024
·
6 authors
·
Open access
72
citations
Evaluating medical tests: introducing the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
·
2023
·
5 authors
·
review
·
Open access
228
citations
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy
Wiley eBooks
·
2023
·
4 authors
·
book
755
citations
Evaluating medical tests
·
2023
·
2 authors
·
other
·
Open access
118
citations
A declaração PRISMA 2020: diretriz atualizada para relatar revisões sistemáticas
Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública
·
2022
·
26 authors
·
Open access
439
citations
A declaração PRISMA 2020: diretriz atualizada para relatar revisões sistemáticas
Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
·
2022
·
26 authors
·
Open access
130
citations
QUAPAS: An Adaptation of the QUADAS-2 Tool to Assess Prognostic Accuracy Studies
Annals of Internal Medicine
·
2022
·
6 authors
·
review
·
Open access
92
citations
Pravila PRISMA 2020.
Medicina Fluminensis
·
2021
·
26 authors
·
Open access
166
citations
A quality assessment tool for artificial intelligence-centered diagnostic test accuracy studies: QUADAS-AI
Nature Medicine
·
2021
·
38 authors
·
Open access
265
citations
Declaración PRISMA 2020: una guía actualizada para la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas
Revista Española de Cardiología (English Edition)
·
2021
·
26 authors
·
Open access
1,309
citations
Declaración PRISMA 2020: una guía actualizada para la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas
Revista Española de Cardiología
·
2021
·
30 authors
·
Open access
2,089
citations
Developing a reporting guideline for artificial intelligence-centred diagnostic test accuracy studies: the STARD-AI protocol
BMJ Open
·
2021
·
30 authors
·
Open access
331
citations
GRADE Guidance: 31. Assessing the certainty across a body of evidence for comparative test accuracy
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
·
2021
·
8 authors
·
Open access
69
citations
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
BMJ
·
2021
·
26 authors
·
review
·
Open access
107,380
citations
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
Systematic Reviews
·
2021
·
26 authors
·
review
·
Open access
13,845
citations
PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews
BMJ
·
2021
·
26 authors
·
review
·
Open access
11,660
citations
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
PLoS Medicine
·
2021
·
26 authors
·
review
·
Open access
5,137
citations
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
International Journal of Surgery
·
2021
·
26 authors
·
review
·
Open access
11,672
citations
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
·
2021
·
26 authors
·
review
·
Open access
4,227
citations
Preferred reporting items for journal and conference abstracts of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA for Abstracts): checklist, explanation, and elaboration
BMJ
·
2021
·
22 authors
·
review
·
Open access
87
citations
Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
·
2021
·
9 authors
·
review
·
Open access
3,479
citations
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
·
2020
·
26 authors
·
preprint
·
Open access
8,068
citations
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
·
2020
·
26 authors
·
preprint
·
Open access
5,174
citations
PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews
·
2020
·
26 authors
·
preprint
·
Open access
916
citations
PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews
·
2020
·
26 authors
·
preprint
·
Open access
167
citations
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): explanation, elaboration, and checklist
BMJ
·
2020
·
21 authors
·
review
·
Open access
716
citations
Developing specific reporting guidelines for diagnostic accuracy studies assessing AI interventions: The STARD-AI Steering Group
Nature Medicine
·
2020
·
17 authors
·
Open access
270
citations
GRADE guidelines: 21 part 1. Study design, risk of bias, and indirectness in rating the certainty across a body of evidence for test accuracy
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
·
2020
·
31 authors
·
Open access
408
citations
GRADE guidelines: 21 part 2. Test accuracy: inconsistency, imprecision, publication bias, and other domains for rating the certainty of evidence and presenting it in evidence profiles and summary of findings tables
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
·
2020
·
9 authors
·
Open access
389
citations
GRADE guidelines: 21 part 2. Inconsistency, Imprecision, publication bias and other domains for rating the certainty of evidence for test accuracy and presenting it in evidence profiles and summary of findings tables.
LSTM Online Archive (Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine)
·
2020
·
31 authors
·
Open access
156
citations
Targeted test evaluation: a framework for designing diagnostic accuracy studies with clear study hypotheses
Diagnostic and Prognostic Research
·
2019
·
4 authors
·
Open access
77
citations
Mapping of reporting guidance for systematic reviews and meta-analyses generated a comprehensive item bank for future reporting guidelines
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
·
2019
·
8 authors
·
review
·
Open access
207
citations
Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy: The PRISMA-DTA Statement
Radiology
·
2018
·
2 authors
·
editorial
·
Open access
56
citations
Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies
JAMA
·
2018
·
25 authors
·
review
·
Open access
3,196
citations
Recommendations for reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy: a systematic review
Systematic Reviews
·
2017
·
8 authors
·
review
·
Open access
142
citations
STARD for Abstracts: essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies in journal or conference abstracts
BMJ
·
2017
·
9 authors
·
Open access
77
citations
Reporting of imaging diagnostic accuracy studies with focus on MRI subgroup: Adherence to STARD 2015
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
·
2017
·
7 authors
·
Open access
59
citations
Overinterpretation of Research Findings: Evidence of “Spin” in Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies
Clinical Chemistry
·
2017
·
6 authors
·
review
·
Open access
72
citations
STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration
BMJ Open
·
2016
·
11 authors
·
Open access
2,564
citations
Updating standards for reporting diagnostic accuracy: the development of STARD 2015
Research Integrity and Peer Review
·
2016
·
12 authors
·
Open access
84
citations
Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Accuracy in Imaging Journals: Analysis of Pooling Techniques and Their Effect on Summary Estimates of Diagnostic Accuracy
Radiology
·
2016
·
4 authors
·
Open access
57
citations
Anticipating missing reference standard data when planning diagnostic accuracy studies
BMJ
·
2016
·
6 authors
·
Open access
50
citations
STARD 2015: updated reporting guidelines for all diagnostic accuracy studies.
Europe PMC (PubMed Central)
·
2016
·
4 authors
·
Open access
85
citations
Improving GRADE evidence tables part 1: a randomized trial shows improved understanding of content in summary of findings tables with a new format
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
·
2016
·
23 authors
·
Open access
129
citations
STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies
BMJ
·
2015
·
16 authors
·
Open access
3,623
citations
STARD 2015: An Updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies
Radiology
·
2015
·
16 authors
·
Open access
1,346
citations
STARD 2015: An Updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies
Clinical Chemistry
·
2015
·
16 authors
·
Open access
983
citations
Pitfalls of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in Imaging Research
Radiology
·
2015
·
2 authors
·
review
·
Open access
99
citations
Should we search Chinese biomedical databases when performing systematic reviews?
Systematic Reviews
·
2015
·
5 authors
·
review
·
Open access
76
citations
Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies: Some Improvements after 10 Years of STARD
Radiology
·
2014
·
7 authors
·
Open access
110
citations
Cochran's Q test was useful to assess heterogeneity in likelihood ratios in studies of diagnostic accuracy
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
·
2014
·
6 authors
413
citations
Reporting standards for studies of diagnostic test accuracy in dementia
Neurology
·
2014
·
24 authors
·
Open access
196
citations
Applying Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) to diagnostic tests was challenging but doable
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
·
2014
·
10 authors
·
Open access
170
citations
Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research
The Lancet
·
2014
·
9 authors
1,315
citations
Reporting quality of diagnostic accuracy studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis of investigations on adherence to STARD
BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine
·
2013
·
5 authors
·
review
·
Open access
119
citations
Variation of a test’s sensitivity and specificity with disease prevalence
Canadian Medical Association Journal
·
2013
·
5 authors
·
Open access
527
citations
Overinterpretation and Misreporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies: Evidence of “Spin”
Radiology
·
2013
·
6 authors
158
citations
Systematic Reviews of Studies Quantifying the Accuracy of Diagnostic Tests and Markers
Clinical Chemistry
·
2012
·
4 authors
·
review
63
citations
Quantifying the Accuracy of a Diagnostic Test or Marker
Clinical Chemistry
·
2012
·
4 authors
·
review
167
citations