Home/Meta-analysis and systematic reviews

Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy: The PRISMA-DTA Statement

Patrick M. Bossuyt, Matthew D. F. McInnes

Radiology· 2018-07-17· editorial· 56 citationsgreen

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Statistical Methods in Epidemiology Clinical practice guidelines implementation

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Cite this

Patrick M. Bossuyt, Matthew D. F. McInnes (2018). Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy: The PRISMA-DTA Statement. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2018180850

@article{m2018systematic,
  title  = {Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy: The PRISMA-DTA Statement},
  author = {Bossuyt, Patrick M. and McInnes, Matthew D. F.},
  year   = {2018},
  journal = {Radiology},
  doi    = {10.1148/radiol.2018180850}
}

Citations in this library

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 56 citations exist upstream.

References

2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions

2018Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies

2010Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up?

2005Relative Citation Impact of Various Study Designs in the Health Sciences

2013Association of Study Quality with Completeness of Reporting: Have Completeness of Reporting and Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in Major Radiology Journals Changed Since Publication of the PRISMA Statement?

2015Pitfalls of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in Imaging Research

2017Overinterpretation of Research Findings: Evidence of “Spin” in Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies

2016Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Accuracy in Imaging Journals: Analysis of Pooling Techniques and Their Effect on Summary Estimates of Diagnostic Accuracy