S
Zodix
Study
Academic Library
Search
Dashboard
Shelves
Open access
My library
Inbox
Notes
Write
Learn
Alerts
More
Ask your library
Notifications
Quick cite
Review
Search or jump to…
⌘K
Ba’ Pham · Study
Home
/
Author
Ba’ Pham
13 works
· latest 2022
· 4 institutions
cluster: provisional
Follow
Claim this profile
h-index
13
i10
13
Citations
5,335
Works here
13
98
00
01
02
05
09
18
20
21
22
Most cited in this library
Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?
1998 · 3,560 citations
Does the inclusion of grey literature influence estimates of intervention effectiveness reported in meta-analyses?
2000 · 811 citations
Language of publication restrictions in systematic reviews gave different results depending on whether the intervention was conventional or complementary
2005 · 206 citations
Rapid review methods more challenging during COVID-19: commentary with a focus on 8 knowledge synthesis steps
2020 · 118 citations
A Comparison of the Quality of Cochrane Reviews and Systematic Reviews Published in Paper-Based Journals
2002 · 111 citations
Works
13 shown
The web-based “Right Review” tool asks reviewers simple questions to suggest methods from 41 knowledge synthesis methods
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
·
2022
·
9 authors
56
citations
Guidance for using artificial intelligence for title and abstract screening while conducting knowledge syntheses
BMC Medical Research Methodology
·
2021
·
8 authors
·
Open access
104
citations
Text mining to support abstract screening for knowledge syntheses: a semi-automated workflow
Systematic Reviews
·
2021
·
12 authors
·
Open access
63
citations
Rapid review methods more challenging during COVID-19: commentary with a focus on 8 knowledge synthesis steps
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
·
2020
·
22 authors
·
Open access
118
citations
Few studies exist examining methods for selecting studies, abstracting data, and appraising quality in a systematic review
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
·
2018
·
7 authors
·
review
·
Open access
86
citations
An international survey indicated that unpublished systematic reviews exist
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
·
2009
·
9 authors
·
review
64
citations
For randomized controlled trials, the quality of reports of complementary and alternative medicine was as good as reports of conventional medicine
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
·
2005
·
4 authors
56
citations
Systematic reviews involving complementary and alternative medicine interventions had higher quality of reporting than conventional medicine reviews
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
·
2005
·
4 authors
·
review
39
citations
Language of publication restrictions in systematic reviews gave different results depending on whether the intervention was conventional or complementary
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
·
2005
·
4 authors
·
review
206
citations
A Comparison of the Quality of Cochrane Reviews and Systematic Reviews Published in Paper-Based Journals
Evaluation & the Health Professions
·
2002
·
5 authors
·
review
111
citations
Is There a “Best” Way to Detect and Minimize Publication Bias?
Evaluation & the Health Professions
·
2001
·
5 authors
61
citations
Does the inclusion of grey literature influence estimates of intervention effectiveness reported in meta-analyses?
The Lancet
·
2000
·
4 authors
811
citations
Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?
The Lancet
·
1998
·
7 authors
3,560
citations