SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A Realist Approach to the Systematic Review
16 references·2 citing·41 second hop
A Realist Approach to the Systematic Review (2008)A Realist Approach to the Systematic Revi…Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2008)Cochrane Database of Systemat…The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporti…Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)Strengthening the reporting o…Learning from Evidence in a Complex World (2006)Learning from Evidence in a C…Realist review - a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions (2005)Realist review - a new method…Criteria for the systematic review of health promotion and public health interventions (2005)Criteria for the systematic r…The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2004)The Cochrane Database of Syst…Rating the strength of scientific evidence: relevance for quality improvement programs (2004)Rating the strength of scient…Improving the Reporting Quality of Nonrandomized Evaluations of Behavioral and Public Health Interventions: The TREND Statement (2004)Improving the Reporting Quali…Social determinants of health: the solid facts (2003)Social determinants of health…Evidence, hierarchies, and typologies: horses for courses: Table 1 (2003)Evidence, hierarchies, and ty…The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revise…The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revise…Evaluation in Health Promotion: Principles and Perspectives. WHO Regional Publications, European Series. (2001)Evaluation in Health Promotio…Out of Control (1995)Out of ControlEfficacy and effectiveness trials (and other phases of research) in the development of health promotion programs (1986)Efficacy and effectiveness tr…What Synthesis Methodology Should I Use? A Review and Analysis of Approaches to Research Synthesis. (2016)What Synthesis Methodology Sh…Program theory evaluation: Logic analysis (2010)Program theory evaluation: Lo…Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research (1963)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)A taxonomy of behavior change techniques used in interventions. (2008)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis (2019)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)Crime, Shame and Reintegration (1989)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)The Discovery of Grounded Theory (2017)The Discovery of Grounded Theory (2017)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1975)The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action (1985)System Dynamics Modeling for Public Health: Background and Opportunities (2006)Complex Systems Thinking and Current Impasses in Health Disparities Research (2011)Systems Science Methods in Public Health: Dynamics, Networks, and Agents (2012)Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews (1994)Rebooting Psychotherapy Research and Practice to Reduce the Burden of Mental Illness (2011)The Efficacy of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: A Review of Meta-analyses (2012)Theories of behaviour and behaviour change across the social and behavioural sciences: a scoping review (2014)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)The social dimension of sustainable development: Defining urban social sustainability (2009)The Global Economic Burden of Noncommunicable Diseases (2012)The Problem With the Phrase Women and Minorities: Intersectionality—an Important Theoretical Framework for Public Health (2012)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (2014)A Comprehensive Review and a Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Internet-Based Psychotherapeutic Interventions (2008)Social determinants of mental health (2014)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2007The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies23,532 cited
  • 2007Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies10,904 cited
  • 2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials5,372 cited
  • 2008Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews4,552 cited
  • 2005Realist review - a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions3,395 cited
  • 2004Improving the Reporting Quality of Nonrandomized Evaluations of Behavioral and Public Health Interventions: The TREND Statement2,882 cited
  • 2003Social determinants of health: the solid facts2,826 cited
  • 2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials2,754 cited
  • 2004The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews1,515 cited
  • 2006Learning from Evidence in a Complex World984 cited
  • 1995Out of Control785 cited
  • 1986Efficacy and effectiveness trials (and other phases of research) in the development of health promotion programs733 cited
  • 2005Criteria for the systematic review of health promotion and public health interventions572 cited
  • 2003

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Evidence, hierarchies, and typologies: horses for courses: Table 1
540 cited
  • 2001Evaluation in Health Promotion: Principles and Perspectives. WHO Regional Publications, European Series.463 cited
  • 2004Rating the strength of scientific evidence: relevance for quality improvement programs189 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2016What Synthesis Methodology Should I Use? A Review and Analysis of Approaches to Research Synthesis.246 cited
    • 2010Program theory evaluation: Logic analysis197 cited