Logic of Evaluation

Michael S. Scriven

134 citations0/0 files stored

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Linguistics and Discourse Analysis Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge Education and Critical Thinking Development

Abstract

A sketch of the arguments for adding the logic of evaluation to the areas of argumentation that have been partly mapped and are worth further work by workers in rhetoric, argumentation, communication, critical thinking, and informal logic. Brief coverage of: (i) the arguments that there cannot be any legitimate logic of evaluation; of (ii) the nature of evaluation (conceptions and misconceptions); and of (iii) the technical apparatus of evaluation logic.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 134 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2006AMEE Education Guide no. 29: Evaluating educational programmes 2008A mobile phone program to track young people’s experiences of mood, stress and coping 2019Improving conservation practice with principles and tools from systems thinking and evaluation 2020Criteria for assessing grant applications: a systematic review 2009How Legitimate and Justified are Judgments in Program Evaluation?2008Financial Education and Program Evaluation 2017The leap from ROI to SROI: Farther than expected?2020The whole elephant: Defining evaluation

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.