Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

The Ability of Professional Standards to Mitigate Aggressive Reporting.

11 references·16 citing·47 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1978A Contingency Model for the Selection of Decision Strategies920 cited
1985Accountability: The neglected social context of judgment and choice.625 cited
1989Social and cognitive strategies for coping with accountability: Conformity, complexity, and bolstering.610 cited
1980FISCAL INEQUITY AND TAX EVASION: AN EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH469 cited
1981Smoothing income numbers : objectives, means, and implications376 cited
1974TAXATION AND PUBLIC OPINION IN SWEDEN: AN INTERPRETATION OF RECENT SURVEY DATA369 cited
1993Debiasing Audit Judgment with Accountability: A Framework and Experimental Results366 cited
1990Pressure and Performance in Accounting Decision Settings: Paradoxical Effects of Incentives, Feedback, and Justification342 cited
1992Effects of justification and a mechanical aid on judgment performance237 cited
1977Good Intentions and Unintended Evil: The Case Against Selective Credit Allocation208 cited
1988Financial Engineering in Corporate Finance: An Overview181 cited

Cited by

2012Rules-Based Accounting Standards and Litigation155 cited
2003Evaluating Concepts-Based vs. Rules-Based Approaches to Standard Setting152 cited
2017Unintended Consequences of Linking Tax Return Disclosures to Financial Reporting for Income Taxes: Evidence from Schedule UTP

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

148 cited

2007Directional Preferences, Information Processing, and Investors' Forecasts of Earnings135 cited

2001Cognitive dissonance and resistance to change: the influence of commitment confirmation and feedback on judgment usefulness of accounting systems117 cited

2006Rules, principles and judgments in accounting standards106 cited

2008Do Effects of Client Preference on Accounting Professionals' Information Search and Subsequent Judgments Persist with High Practice Risk?103 cited

2019Real effects of reporting key audit matters on auditors' judgment and choice of action101 cited

2011Can Reporting Norms Create a Safe Harbor? Jury Verdicts against Auditors under Precise and Imprecise Accounting Standards98 cited

2005Investors' Evaluations of Strategic Prior-Period Benchmark Disclosures in Earnings Announcements95 cited

2010The Effects of a Supervisor’s Active Intervention in Subordinates’ Judgments, Directional Goals, and Perceived Technical Knowledge Advantage on Audit Team Judgments93 cited

2004The Impact of the Type of Accounting Standards on Preparers’ Judgments85 cited

2014The Impact of Recognition Versus Disclosure on Financial Information: A Preparer's Perspective81 cited

2001The meaning of a defined accounting concept: regulatory changes and the effect on auditor decision making76 cited

2008The Strength of an Accounting Firm’s Ethical Environment and the Quality of Auditors’ Judgments71 cited

2021Industry and geographic peer effects on corporate tax avoidance: Evidence from China69 cited