SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Incorporation bias in studies of diagnostic tests: how to avoid being biased about bias · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleIncorporation bias in studies of diagnostic tests: how to avoid being biased about bias

Andrew Worster2008

OA

Articlebronze2008

Incorporation bias in studies of diagnostic tests: how to avoid being biased about bias

Andrew Worster · Christopher R. Carpenter

109 citations·0/0 files stored·Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Statistical Methods in Epidemiology Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 109 citations exist upstream.

References

1999Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests 2003The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration 2003Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative 2006Evidence of bias and variation in diagnostic accuracy studies 2007Evaluation of diagnostic tests when there is no gold standard. A review of methods 2003Assessment of the accuracy of diagnostic tests: the cross-sectional study 1999Evaluating Bias and Variability in Diagnostic Test Reports

Cited by

2013Understanding the Direction of Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Test Accuracy 2013Latent Class Models in Diagnostic Studies When There is No Reference Standard--A Systematic Review 2023Assessing risk of bias and applicability 2016Partial verification bias and incorporation bias affected accuracy estimates of diagnostic studies for biomarkers that were part of an existing composite gold standard 2021Diagnostic Accuracy Studies in Radiology: How to Recognize and Address Potential Sources of Bias

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2009A review of solutions for diagnostic accuracy studies with an imperfect or missing reference standardreview · 6 shared references 2015Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): Explanation and Elaborationarticle · 4 shared references 2005Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviewsreview · 4 shared references 2016STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaborationarticle · 4 shared references 2018PROBAST: A Tool to Assess Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies: Explanation and Elaborationarticle · 4 shared references 2003The STARD Statement for Reporting Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: Explanation and Elaborationarticle · 4 shared references

Details

Year2008

Typearticle

Published2008-03-01

VenueCanadian Journal of Emergency Medicine

ISSN-L1481-8035

Languageen

Citations109

Files0 public / 0

ShelfMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

Identifiers

doi10.1017/s1481803500009891

openalex_workW123476994

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.

2023

Best Practice for MRI Diagnostic Accuracy Research With Lessons and Examples from the LI‐RADS Individual Participant Data Group