An Evaluation of Alternative Forecasting Methods to Recreation Visitation

Rachel J. C. Chen · Peter Bloomfield · Joshua S. Fu

82 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Leisure Research

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Forecasting Techniques and Applications Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management Grey System Theory Applications

Abstract

This study examines the advantages and disadvantages of basic, intermediate, and advanced methods for visitor use forecasting where seasonality and limited data are characteristics of the estimation problem. The monthly use rates at the Milwaukee County Zoo, Wisconsin are used to illustrate the seasonal time series techniques. Forecasting methods include the Naive 1, Naive 2, single moving average (SMA) with the classical decomposition procedure, single exponential smoothing (SES), double exponential smoothing (DES), Winter's, and the seasonal autoregressive integrated moving average (SARIMA). The variation in visitor rates over the years makes the visitation trend for the Milwaukee County Zoo appealing in this empirical application. The series ranges from January 1981 through December 1999, a total of 228 months. The last 12, 24, or 60 months of those data are excluded from the original analysis, and used to evaluate the various methods. SARIMA and SMA with the classical decomposition procedure are found to be roughly equivalent in performance, as judged by modified mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) and modified root mean square percentage error (RMSPE) values of a longer estimation period with shorter period ahead forecasts. This study also finds that the SMA with classical decomposition method is more accurate than other techniques when a shorter estimation period with longer period ahead forecasts are included. While this study may not speak to all users of leisure related data, it serves as a comparative reference for those who seek guidance in deciding among a set of forecasting tools.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 82 citations exist upstream.

References

1977Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control 1971Time Series Analysis Forecasting and Control.1960Forecasting Sales by Exponentially Weighted Moving Averages 1985Exponential smoothing: The state of the art 1979Forecasting: Methods and Applications.1995Forecasting tourism demand: A review of empirical research 1982Industrial and business forecasting methods : a practical guide to exponential smoothing and curve fitting 1979Accuracy of Forecasting: An Empirical Investigation

Cited by

2010A management orientated approach to combination forecasting of tourism demand 2013A Comparative Analysis of Three Types of Tourism Demand Forecasting Models: Individual, Linear Combination and Non-linear Combination 2007Comparing Forecasting Models in Tourism 2009Applicability of the Revised Mean Absolute Percentage Errors (MAPE) Approach to Some Popular Normal and Non-normal Independent Time Series 2020Forecasting key indicators of China's inbound and outbound tourism: optimistic–pessimistic method

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.