The Validity of Using Holistic Scoring to Evaluate Writing: A Critical Overview

Davida Charney

199 citations0/0 files storedResearch in the Teaching of English

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning Student Assessment and Feedback Writing and Handwriting Education

Abstract

you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 199 citations exist upstream.

References

1974Measuring Growth in English

Cited by

1998Using FACETS to model rater training effects 2003Rearticulating Writing Assessment for Teaching and Learning 2010Reliability and validity of rubrics for assessment through writing 1990The Literature of Direct Writing Assessment: Major Concerns and Prevailing Trends 2003What We Really Value: Beyond Rubrics in Teaching and Assessing Writing 1988Attentional overload and writing performance: Effects of rough draft and outline strategies.1987Effects of topic knowledge on the allocation of processing time and cognitive effort to writing processes 2005Generalizability of writing scores: an application of structural equation modeling

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.