SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Conflicting conclusions from two systematic reviews of epidural steroid injections for sciatica: which evidence should general practitioners heed?
5 references·4 citing·39 second hop
Conflicting conclusions from two systematic reviews of epidural steroid injections for sciatica: which evidence should general practitioners heed? (1999)Conflicting conclusions from two systemat…Meta-analysis and the meta-epidemiology of clinical research (1997)Meta-analysis and the meta-ep…Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Bias in meta-analysis detecte…Users' guides to the medical literature. VI. How to use an overview. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group (1994)Users' guides to the medical …Users' Guides to the Medical Literature (1994)Users' Guides to the Medical …Can meta-analyses be trusted? (1991)Can meta-analyses be trusted?Comparison of two independent systematic reviews of trials of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2): the Yale Open Data Access Medtronic Project (2017)Comparison of two independent…Systematic reviews and their role in evidence-informed health care. (2008)Systematic reviews and their …Reproducibility of systematic literature reviews on food, nutrition, physical activity and endometrial cancer (2007)Reproducibility of systematic…Synthesizing medical evidence: systematic reviews and metaanalyses (2005)Synthesizing medical evidence…A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial (1981)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Excess mortality of mental disorder (1998)The association between obesity and anxiety disorders in the population: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2009)Dictator games: a meta study (2011)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Editorial: Methodology and reporting of meta-analyses in the neurosurgical literature (2014)Meta-analysis in social research (1982)Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research. (1994)How to read a paper: Papers that go beyond numbers (qualitative research) (1997)Method Guidelines for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group for Spinal Disorders (1997)Towards systematic reviews that inform health care management and policy-making (2005)Methods for Trend Estimation from Summarized Dose-Response Data, with Applications to Meta-Analysis (1992)A guide to interpreting discordant systematic reviews. (1997)Systematic Reviews in Health Care (2001)Feasibility study and evaluation of expert opinion on the semi-automated meta-analysis and the conventional meta-analysis (2022)STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT (1986)Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias (1994)The cochrane database of systematic reviews (1996)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)Discrepancies between Meta-Analyses and Subsequent Large Randomized, Controlled Trials (1997)Publication bias: evidence of delayed publication in a cohort study of clinical research projects (1997)Evolution of treatment effects over time: Empirical insight from recursive cumulative metaanalyses (2001)Where now for meta-analysis? (2002)Comparison of treatment effect sizes associated with surrogate and final patient relevant outcomes in randomised controlled trials: meta-epidemiological study (2013)Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Clinical Decisions (1997)Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews (2007)Advanced technologies enabled human resources functions: Benefits, challenges, and functionalities: A systematic review (2023)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Meta-analysis of individual participant data: rationale, conduct, and reporting (2010)Moral entrepreneurship, the power‐knowledge nexus, and the Cochrane “crisis” (2019)Overlapping network meta‐analyses on psoriasis systemic treatments, an overview: quantity does not make quality (2021)Formulating Questions and Locating Primary Studies for Inclusion in Systematic Reviews (1997)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (2000)How to Read a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis and Apply the Results to Patient Care (2014)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1997Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test56,637 cited
  • 1994Users' Guides to the Medical Literature813 cited
  • 1991Can meta-analyses be trusted?489 cited
  • 1994Users' guides to the medical literature. VI. How to use an overview. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group486 cited
  • 1997Meta-analysis and the meta-epidemiology of clinical research211 cited

Cited by

  • 2005Synthesizing medical evidence: systematic reviews and metaanalyses41 cited
  • 2008Systematic reviews and their role in evidence-informed health care.25 cited
  • 2017Comparison of two independent systematic reviews of trials of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2): the Yale Open Data Access Medtronic Project21 cited
  • 2007Reproducibility of systematic literature reviews on food, nutrition, physical activity and endometrial cancer15 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work