Reconciliation Through the Public Use of Reason

Unknown author

537 citations0/0 files storedThe Journal of Philosophy

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Political Philosophy and Ethics Philosophical Ethics and Theory Critical Theory and Philosophy

Abstract

L'A. critique la conception de la justice de J. Rawls qui, fondee sur des principes deontologiques, ne fait pas de distinction entre les questions de justification et les questions d'acceptation, d'une part, et l'autonomie privee et l'autonomie publique, d'autre part. Dans l'article suivant intitule «Reply to Habermas» («The Journal of Philosophy», vol. 42, n°3, mars 1995, pp. 132-180), J. Rawls explique la signification de son liberalisme politique

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 537 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

1999On the Cunning of Imperialist Reason 2011Justification and Application 2000Five Arguments for Deliberative Democracy 2003When Does Deliberation Begin? Internal Reflection versus Public Discussion in Deliberative Democracy 2006Salvaging and secularizing the semantic contents of religion: the limitations of Habermas’s postmetaphysical proposal 2011The Colonization Thesis: Habermas on Reification 2008Can the all-affected principle include future persons? Green deliberative democracy and the non-identity problem 2001A Strategic Approach to Multistakeholder Negotiations

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.