Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Dashboard Shelves Open access My library Inbox Notes Write Learn Alerts

More

Ask your library Notifications Quick cite Review

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Reporting of Adverse Effects in Clinical Trials Should Be Improved

7 references·16 citing·36 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1996Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?17,580 cited
1995Empirical Evidence of Bias5,632 cited
1995Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials5,560 cited
1996Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement3,337 cited
1996Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials3,126 cited
1994A Proposal for Structured Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials307 cited
1996Developing a database of published reports of randomised clinical trials in pain research 1271 cited

Cited by

2005Challenges in Systematic Reviews That Assess Treatment Harms147 cited
2001Reporting of adverse drug reactions in randomised controlled trials – a systematic survey128 cited
2013Adherence to CONSORT Adverse Event Reporting Guidelines in Randomized Clinical Trials Evaluating Systemic Cancer Therapy: A Systematic Review125 cited
2001Incomplete evidence: the inadequacy of databases in tracing published adverse drug reactions in clinical trials110 cited
2004Safety Reporting in Randomized Trials of Mental Health Interventions84 cited
2004Availability of large-scale evidence on specific harms from systematic reviews of randomized trials79 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2005Challenges in Systematic Reviews of Therapeutic Devices and Procedures70 cited

2012Adherence to CONSORT harms-reporting recommendations in publications of recent analgesic clinical trials: An ACTTION systematic review65 cited

2013Adverse event assessment, analysis, and reporting in recent published analgesic clinical trials: ACTTION systematic review and recommendations58 cited

2012Adverse event reporting in randomised controlled trials of neuropathic pain: Considerations for future practice49 cited

2005Reporting of Harm in Randomized, Controlled Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatment for Rheumatic Disease49 cited

2010Reporting randomised clinical trials of analgesics after traumatic or orthopaedic surgery is inadequate: a systematic review37 cited

2011Complementary medicine and safety: A systematic investigation of design and reporting of systematic reviews34 cited

2021Methodologies for systematic reviews with meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials in pain, anaesthesia, and perioperative medicine34 cited

2006Methodological shortcomings predicted lower harm estimates in one of two sets of studies of clinical interventions30 cited

2018Reporting quality of trial abstracts—improved yet suboptimal: A systematic review and meta‐analysis28 cited