The New Testament Documents, Are They Reliable?

F. F. Bruce

28 citations0/0 files stored

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Biblical Studies and Interpretation Classical Studies and Philology Historical and Linguistic Studies

Abstract

Because Christianity claims to be a historical revelation, says Bruce, the quesion of the reliability of the documents on which it was founded is a crucial one. Here he presents the most convincing evidence for the historical trustworthiness of the canon of the New Testament.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 28 citations exist upstream.

References

1970New Testament Introduction 2009Luke the historian in recent study 1960Josephus and the New Testament 1963The Birth of the New Testament 2012The miracle-stories of the Gospels 1910The bearing of recent discovery on the trustworthiness of the New Testament

Cited by

2006The Genre of Acts: Moving Toward a Consensus?1991Is there A Place for Historical Criticism?

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.