SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Development of the Veritas plot and its application in cardiac surgery: an evidence-synthesis graphic tool for the clinician to assess multiple meta-analyses reporting on a common outcome.
16 references·0 citing·43 second hop
Development of the Veritas plot and its application in cardiac surgery: an evidence-synthesis graphic tool for the clinician to assess multiple meta-analyses reporting on a common outcome. (2009)Development of the Veritas plot and its a…Uncertainty in heterogeneity estimates in meta-analyses (2007)Uncertainty in heterogeneity …Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2007)Development of AMSTAR: a meas…Comparison of Two Methods to Detect Publication Bias in Meta-analysis (2006)Comparison of Two Methods to …Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Meta-analysis of Observationa…Empirical assessment of effect of publication bias on meta-analyses (2000)Empirical assessment of effec…Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Improving the quality of repo…Summing up evidence: one answer is not always enough (1998)Summing up evidence: one answ…Meta-analysis: Potentials and promise (1997)Meta-analysis: Potentials and…Discrepancies between Meta-Analyses and Subsequent Large Randomized, Controlled Trials (1997)Discrepancies between Meta-An…Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Bias in meta-analysis detecte…Systematic Reviews: Checklists for review articles (1994)Systematic Reviews: Checklist…Meta-Analysis, Decision Analysis, and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Methods for Quantitative Synthesis in Medicine (1994)Meta-Analysis, Decision Analy…Cumulative Meta-Analysis of Therapeutic Trials for Myocardial Infarction (1992)Cumulative Meta-Analysis of T…Can meta-analyses be trusted? (1991)Can meta-analyses be trusted?An exercise in mega-silliness. (1978)An exercise in mega-silliness.Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research (1976)Primary, Secondary, and Meta-…The Combination of Estimates from Different Experiments (1954)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Sensitivity of between-study heterogeneity in meta-analysis: proposed metrics and empirical evaluation (2008)Undue reliance on I 2 in assessing heterogeneity may mislead (2008)The heterogeneity statistic I2 can be biased in small meta-analyses (2015)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses (2010)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias (1994)Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2000)A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. (2006)Quantity and Quality of Sleep and Incidence of Type 2 Diabetes (2009)A Global Perspective on Child Sexual Abuse: Meta-Analysis of Prevalence Around the World (2011)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Summarizing systematic reviews (2015)Development of a critical appraisal tool to assess the quality of cross-sectional studies (AXIS) (2016)STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT (1986)The cochrane database of systematic reviews (1996)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction (1992)Collaborative Care for Depression (2006)Evaluation of networks of randomized trials (2007)Is psychology suffering from a replication crisis? What does “failure to replicate” really mean? (2015)Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence‐Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review (2003)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Social Relationships and Mortality Risk: A Meta-analytic Review (2010)Loneliness and Social Isolation as Risk Factors for Mortality (2015)How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study (2003)Positive Psychological Well-Being and Mortality: A Quantitative Review of Prospective Observational Studies (2008)Trial sequential analysis reveals insufficient information size and potentially false positive results in many meta-analyses (2008)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1997Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test56,637 cited
  • 2000Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting20,612 cited
  • 1976Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research4,889 cited
  • 1999Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement4,828 cited
  • 2007Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews4,376 cited
  • 2006Comparison of Two Methods to Detect Publication Bias in Meta-analysis2,273 cited
  • 2000Empirical assessment of effect of publication bias on meta-analyses1,398 cited
  • 2007Uncertainty in heterogeneity estimates in meta-analyses1,252 cited
  • 1997Discrepancies between Meta-Analyses and Subsequent Large Randomized, Controlled Trials1,170 cited
  • 1992Cumulative Meta-Analysis of Therapeutic Trials for Myocardial Infarction1,138 cited
  • 1994Meta-Analysis, Decision Analysis, and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Methods for Quantitative Synthesis in Medicine871 cited
  • 1998Summing up evidence: one answer is not always enough655 cited
  • 1997Meta-analysis: Potentials and promise646 cited
  • 1991Can meta-analyses be trusted?489 cited
  • 1994

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Systematic Reviews: Checklists for review articles
480 cited
  • 1978An exercise in mega-silliness.466 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.