Group Decision Support: The Effects of Designated Human Leaders and Statistical Feedback in Computerized Conferences

Abstract

:Twenty-four groups of five professionals and managers used computer conferences to reach agreement on the best solution to a complex ranking problem. Two software tools for structuring the conferences were employed in a two-by-two factorial design. Groups with “designated leadership” (DL) used software support. to elect a discussion leader. Groups with “statistical feedback” (SF) were presented with tables periodicall y that displayed the mean rank and degree of conse~sus for each Item. DL improved levels of consensus; in the absence of a leader, SF:improve level of agreement slightly. Statistical feedback as operationalized in this experiment was detrimental to the ability of a group to achieve collective mtelhgence, defmed as a group decision better than the prediscussion decision of any of its individual members. Characteristics of the individuals and groups were also associated with vanattons in outcomes.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 78 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.