See-through Science: Why public engagement needs to move upstream

Abstract

Spurred on by controversies over BSE, GM crops and nanotechnology, scientists gradually started to involve the public in their work. They looked first to education as the answer, then to processes of dialogue and participation. But these efforts have not yet proved sufficient. Scientists need to find ways of listening to and valuing more diverse forms of public knowledge. Only by opening up innovation processes at an early stage can we ensure that science contributes to the common good. Debates about risk are important. But the public also want answers to the more fundamental questions at stake in any new technology: Who owns it? Who benefits from it? To what purposes will it be directed? In this influential 2004 Demos report, James Wilsdon and Rebecca Willis argued that public engagement had to move upstream. The pamphlet offers practical guidance for scientists, policymakers, research councils businesses and NGOs – anyone who is trying to make engagement work.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 785 citations exist upstream.