International Capital Mobility in Developing Countries vs. Industrial Countries: What do Saving-Investment Correlations Tell Us?

Abstract

The finding of Feldstein and Horioka (1980) that countries' investment rates are highly correlated with their national saving rates has by now been confirmed by many subsequent studies, even though their inference that international capital mobility must be low has not been as widely accepted.This paper examines the statistical relationship between national saving and investment in a sample that includes not Only 1 L industrialized countries, but also 50 developing countries.The paper addresses some of the econometric critiques that have been aimed at the Feldstein-Horioka work.Contrary to what one would expect from consideration of capital mobility, the coefficient appears higher for industrialized countries than for developing countries, and higher after 1973 than before.Our interpretation of the saving-investment evidence is that the hypothesis of a high degree of substitutability for claims on physical capital located in different countries is not supported by the data.International substitutability for financial capital may be high, but this is a separate condition (which is properly tested by looking directly at rates of return).High international substitutability for bonds would inply high international substitutability for physical capital if capital were perfectly substitutable for bonds within each country, but there is no reason for this to hold, any more than there is for all goods to be perfect substitutes.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 52 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.