SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Junta Distributions and the Average-Case Complexity of Manipulating Elections
5 references·16 citing·26 second hopsampled
Junta Distributions and the Average-Case Complexity of Manipulating Elections (2007)Junta Distributions and the Average-Case …How hard is it to control an election? (1992)How hard is it to control an …Single transferable vote resists strategic voting (1991)Single transferable vote resi…Voting schemes for which it can be difficult to tell who won the election (1989)Voting schemes for which it c…The computational difficulty of manipulating an election (1989)The computational difficulty …Strategy-proofness and Arrow's conditions: Existence and correspondence theorems for voting procedures and social welfare functions (1975)Strategy-proofness and Arrow'…Barriers to Manipulation in Voting (2016)Barriers to Manipulation in V…Bypassing Combinatorial Protections: Polynomial-Time Algorithms for Single-Peaked Electorates (2015)Bypassing Combinatorial Prote…The complexity of manipulative attacks in nearly single-peaked electorates (2013)The complexity of manipulativ…Better Human Computation Through Principled Voting (2013)Better Human Computation Thro…Unweighted Coalitional Manipulation Under the Borda Rule Is NP-Hard (2011)Unweighted Coalitional Manipu…Multimode Control Attacks on Elections (2011)Multimode Control Attacks on …Bypassing Combinatorial Protections: Polynomial-Time Algorithms for Single-Peaked Electorates (2010)Bypassing Combinatorial Prote…Where are the really hard manipulation problems? The phase transition in manipulating the veto rule (2009)Where are the really hard man…Sincere‐Strategy Preference‐Based Approval Voting Fully Resists Constructive Control and Broadly Resists Destructive Control (2009)Sincere‐Strategy Preference‐B…Eliciting Single-Peaked Preferences Using Comparison Queries (2009)Eliciting Single-Peaked Prefe…Complexity of unweighted coalitional manipulation under some common voting rules (2009)Complexity of unweighted coal…Generalized scoring rules and the frequency of coalitional manipulability (2008)Generalized scoring rules and…Copeland voting: ties matter (2008)Copeland voting: ties matterComplexity of Strategic Behavior in Multi-Winner Elections (2008)Complexity of Strategic Behav…Algorithms for the coalitional manipulation problem (2008)Algorithms for the coalitiona…Dichotomy for voting systems (2006)Dichotomy for voting systemsMultipart pricing of public goods (1971)Incentives in Teams (1973)Manipulation of Voting Schemes: A General Result (1973)Clone structures in voters' preferences (2012)An Introduction to Positive Political Theory (1973)Optimal social choice functions (2012)The Theory of Committees and Elections. (1959)Condorcet Social Choice Functions (1977)Social Choice Theory and Deliberative Democracy: A Reconciliation (2002)Essai sur l'application de l'analyse à la probabilité des décisions rendues à la pluralité des voix (2014)COUNTERSPECULATION, AUCTIONS, AND COMPETITIVE SEALED TENDERS (1961)Swap Bribery (2009)Computing the margin of victory for various voting rules (2012)Multiagent systems: algorithmic, game-theoretic, and logical foundations (2009)Multivariate Complexity Analysis of Swap Bribery (2011)Achieving fully proportional representation: Approximability results (2015)Social Choice and Individual Values. (1951)Incentive Compatibility and the Bargaining Problem (1979)The Theory of Incentives: The Principal-Agent Model (2001)A Short Introduction to Computational Social Choice (2007)Considerations on Representative Government (2010)The decision and the organization (1965)Anyone but him: The complexity of precluding an alternative (2007)When are elections with few candidates hard to manipulate? (2007)Hybrid Elections Broaden Complexity‐Theoretic Resistance to Control (2009)Multi-Winner Voting with Approval Preferences (2022)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 1975Strategy-proofness and Arrow's conditions: Existence and correspondence theorems for voting procedures and social welfare functions2,821 cited
  • 1989Voting schemes for which it can be difficult to tell who won the election548 cited
  • 1989The computational difficulty of manipulating an election530 cited
  • 1991Single transferable vote resists strategic voting394 cited
  • 1992How hard is it to control an election?391 cited

Cited by

  • 2006Dichotomy for voting systems128 cited
  • 2008Algorithms for the coalitional manipulation problem126 cited
  • 2009Eliciting Single-Peaked Preferences Using Comparison Queries123 cited
  • 2011Multimode Control Attacks on Elections117 cited
  • 2008Complexity of Strategic Behavior in Multi-Winner Elections115 cited
  • 2009Complexity of unweighted coalitional manipulation under some common voting rules108 cited
  • 2008Copeland voting: ties matter108 cited
  • 2013Better Human Computation Through Principled Voting107 cited
  • 2008Generalized scoring rules and the frequency of coalitional manipulability106 cited
  • 2011Unweighted Coalitional Manipulation Under the Borda Rule Is NP-Hard95 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2010Bypassing Combinatorial Protections: Polynomial-Time Algorithms for Single-Peaked Electorates84 cited
  • 2009Where are the really hard manipulation problems? The phase transition in manipulating the veto rule83 cited
  • 2013The complexity of manipulative attacks in nearly single-peaked electorates82 cited
  • 2016Barriers to Manipulation in Voting81 cited
  • 2009Sincere‐Strategy Preference‐Based Approval Voting Fully Resists Constructive Control and Broadly Resists Destructive Control79 cited
  • 2015Bypassing Combinatorial Protections: Polynomial-Time Algorithms for Single-Peaked Electorates71 cited