Quality and Comparability in Distance Field Education

Abstract

This article compares MSW field instruction at one local and two distance campus locations. The authors describe four “Action Steps” to design, implement, and evaluate the program with a focus on quality and comparability across sites. Data from students following their first-year field placement in 1995-96 are presented, including their perceptions of local and home-campus program resources, program responsiveness to local agency structures and culture, and program responses to confidentiality issues, a key issue in the comparatively smaller distance sites. The article concludes with suggestions for future development of field instruction in distance education programs.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 20 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.