References

• 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
• 2007Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses5,030 cited
• 2009Comparisons of Citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for Articles Published in General Medical Journals819 cited
• 2010Expediting systematic reviews: methods and implications of rapid reviews752 cited
• 2011Checking reference lists to find additional studies for systematic reviews445 cited
• 2009Literature searching for social science systematic reviews: consideration of a range of search techniques318 cited
• 2013Towards a methodology for cluster searching to provide conceptual and contextual “richness” for systematic reviews of complex interventions: case study (CLUSTER)286 cited
• 2013The expansion of Google Scholar versus Web of Science: a longitudinal study270 cited
• 2010Citation Analysis: Comparison of Web of Science®, Scopus™, SciFinder®, and Google Scholar266 cited
• 2005Systematic reviews need systematic searchers.257 cited
• 2013Are systematic reviews up-to-date at the time of publication?196 cited
• 2008Unpacking your literature search toolbox: on search styles and tactics193 cited
• 1998Review of the usefulness of contacting other experts when conducting a literature search for systematic reviews186 cited