SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Why reports of outcome evaluations are often biased or uninterpretable · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleWhy reports of outcome evaluations are often biased or uninterpretable

Joel M. Moskowitz1993

Article1993

Why reports of outcome evaluations are often biased or uninterpretable

Joel M. Moskowitz

43 citations·0/0 files stored·Evaluation and Program Planning

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Evaluation and Performance Assessment Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Advanced Causal Inference Techniques

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 43 citations exist upstream.

References

1981A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial 1983The Standards for Evaluation of Educational Programs, Projects, and Materials 1980Reporting standards and research strategies for controlled trials 1982Toward Reform of Program Evaluation: Aims, Methods, and Institutional Arrangements.1981Toward reform of program evaluation: Aims, methods, and institutional arrangements 1986Advances in Quasi-Experimental Design and Analysis 1977Sensitivity, bias, and theory in impact evaluations.1985Evaluation: The state of the art and the sorry state of the science

Cited by

1995Measures of impairment for children and adolescents 1998Introduction To the Special Issue 2004The Alcohol Policy Development Process: Policymakers Speak 2010Choosing Effective Youth‐Focused Prevention Strategies: A Practical Guide for Applied Family Professionals 2013Intervention Effectiveness Research in Adolescent Health Psychology: Methodological Issues and Strategies

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

1996Blinding and exclusions after allocation in randomised controlled trials: survey of published parallel group trials in obstetrics and gynaecology: Table 1article · 2 shared references 1986Quality assessment of randomized control trials in dental research I. Methodsarticle · 2 shared references 2008Effects of International Comparative Studies on Educational Quality on the Quality of Educational Researcharticle · 2 shared references 2005Success for All: First-Year Results From the National Randomized Field Trialarticle · 2 shared references 1998Systematic reviews of trials and other studies.article · 2 shared references 1988Qualitative Approaches to Evaluating Educationarticle · 2 shared references

Details

Year1993

Typearticle

Published1993-01-01

VenueEvaluation and Program Planning

ISSN-L0149-7189

Languageen

Citations43

Files0 public / 0

ShelfEvaluation and Performance Assessment

Identifiers

doi10.1016/0149-7189(93)90032-4

openalex_workW1508202035

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.