How to Critically Appraise a Randomized Controlled Trial

Hywel C Williams

6 citations0/0 files storedWiley eBooks

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials Statistical Methods in Epidemiology

Abstract

This chapter contains sections titled: The place of randomized controlled trials Definitions of quality, validity, and bias How to tell a good dermatological RCT from a bad one References

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 6 citations exist upstream.

References

2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials 2001Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials 2009Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence 1999The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis 2005Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research 1995Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists 1997Publication bias: evidence of delayed publication in a cohort study of clinical research projects 2009Challenges in evaluating surgical innovation

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.