SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
How to Critically Appraise a Randomized Controlled Trial
16 references·0 citing·45 second hopsampled
How to Critically Appraise a Randomized Controlled Trial (2008)How to Critically Appraise a Randomized C…Prospective Registration and Outcome-Reporting Bias in Randomized Controlled Trials of Eczema Treatments: A Systematic Review (2012)Prospective Registration and …Core Outcome Domains for Controlled Trials and Clinical Recordkeeping in Eczema: International Multiperspective Delphi Consensus Process (2010)Core Outcome Domains for Cont…Challenges in evaluating surgical innovation (2009)Challenges in evaluating surg…Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence (2009)Avoidable waste in the produc…Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authors (2005)Identifying outcome reporting…Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research (2005)Contradicted and Initially St…Bad reporting does not mean bad methods for randomised trials: observational study of randomised controlled trials performed by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (2004)Bad reporting does not mean b…The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revise…Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)Assessing the quality of cont…EDITORIAL COMMENTCan you COPE with CONSORT? (2000)EDITORIAL COMMENTCan you COPE…The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)The Hazards of Scoring the Qu…Methodology and Reports of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (1998)Methodology and Reports of Sy…Publication bias: evidence of delayed publication in a cohort study of clinical research projects (1997)Publication bias: evidence of…Randomised trials, human nature, and reporting guidelines (1996)Randomised trials, human natu…Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists (1995)Assessing the quality of rand…What is Efficient Vaccination? (1891)What is Efficient Vaccination?Meta-analyses to evaluate analgesic interventions: A systematic qualitative review of their methodology (1996)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Does blinding of readers affect the results of meta-analyses? (1997)Publication and related bias in meta-analysis (2000)Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: secrets of the trade (2006)Publication Decisions and Their Possible Effects on Inferences Drawn from Tests of Significance--Or Vice Versa (1959)Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system (1977)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis (2001)Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2007)A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial (1981)Measuring Health: A Guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires (1987)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)Handbook of research on teaching (1986)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. (1979)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)OMERACT: An international initiative to improve outcome measurement in rheumatology (2007)Extending the CONSORT Statement to Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatment: Explanation and Elaboration (2008)Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement (2008)IDEAL framework for surgical innovation 1: the idea and development stages (2013)CONSORT Statement for Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatments: A 2017 Update and a CONSORT Extension for Nonpharmacologic Trial Abstracts (2017)No Surgical Innovation Without Evaluation (2018)Discrepancies between Meta-Analyses and Subsequent Large Randomized, Controlled Trials (1997)Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling (2012)Meta-analyses involving cross-over trials: methodological issues (2002)Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts (2007)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)What is missing from descriptions of treatment in trials and reviews? (2008)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): Explanation and Elaboration (2015)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials5,372 cited
  • 2001Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials3,309 cited
  • 2009Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence2,207 cited
  • 1999The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis1,981 cited
  • 2005Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research1,465 cited
  • 1995Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists1,306 cited
  • 1997Publication bias: evidence of delayed publication in a cohort study of clinical research projects820 cited
  • 2009Challenges in evaluating surgical innovation654 cited
  • 2005Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authors612 cited
  • 1998Methodology and Reports of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses534 cited
  • 1891What is Efficient Vaccination?348 cited
  • 2004Bad reporting does not mean bad methods for randomised trials: observational study of randomised controlled trials performed by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group318 cited
  • 2010Core Outcome Domains for Controlled Trials and Clinical Recordkeeping in Eczema: International Multiperspective Delphi Consensus Process177 cited
  • 1996

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Randomised trials, human nature, and reporting guidelines
154 cited
  • 2012Prospective Registration and Outcome-Reporting Bias in Randomized Controlled Trials of Eczema Treatments: A Systematic Review60 cited
  • 2000EDITORIAL COMMENTCan you COPE with CONSORT?38 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.