SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Time to register randomised trials
5 references·11 citing·40 second hop
Time to register randomised trials (1999)Time to register randomised trialsPublication Bias: The Problem That Won't Go Away (1993)Publication Bias: The Problem…Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Publication bias in clinical …Underreporting Research Is Scientific Misconduct (1990)Underreporting Research Is Sc…Underreporting research is scientific misconduct (1990)Underreporting research is sc…Publication bias: the case for an international registry of clinical trials. (1986)Publication bias: the case fo…Nonpublication Rates and Characteristics of Registered Randomized Clinical Trials in Digital Health: Cross-Sectional Analysis (2018)Nonpublication Rates and Char…The evolution of assessing bias in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: celebrating methodological contributions of the Cochrane Collaboration (2013)The evolution of assessing bi…Missing a critical piece of the pie: simple document search strategies inadequate for systematic reviews (2009)Missing a critical piece of t…Bibliographic study showed improving methodology of meta-analyses published in leading journals 1993–2002 (2007)Bibliographic study showed im…Interpreting the evidence (2002)Interpreting the evidenceA clinical trials register for Europe (2002)A clinical trials register fo…Using Systematic Reviews and Registers of Ongoing Trials for Scientific and Ethical Trial Design, Monitoring, and Reporting (2001)Using Systematic Reviews and …Publishing study protocols: making them visible will improve registration, reporting and recruitment (2001)Publishing study protocols: m…Evaluation of the usefulness of Internet searches to identify unpublished clinical trials for systematic reviews (2001)Evaluation of the usefulness …Current Controlled Trials: an opportunity to help improve the quality of clinical research (2000)Current Controlled Trials: an…Netprints: the next phase in the evolution of biomedical publishing (1999)Netprints: the next phase in …The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Using the Internet for Surveys and Health Research (2002)Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials (2009)The Short-term Impact of Unconditional Cash Transfers to the Poor: Experimental Evidence from Kenya* (2016)Practical Meta-Analysis (2000)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Empathy and Callous–Unemotional Traits in Different Bullying Roles: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2016)Focused Deterrence Strategies and Crime Control (2018)Hot spots policing and crime reduction: an update of an ongoing systematic review and meta-analysis (2019)Publication Decisions and their Possible Effects on Inferences Drawn from Tests of Significance—or Vice Versa (1959)The Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its Occurrence (1990)Testing and adjusting for publication bias (2001)Publication Bias in Editorial Decision Making (2002)Effectiveness of Treatment Approaches for Children and Adolescents with Reading Disabilities: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials (2014)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)Assessing the Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews of Health Care Interventions (2017)Identifying the ‘incredible’! Part 1: assessing the risk of bias in outcomes included in systematic reviews (2019)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)The application of knowledge synthesis methods in agri-food public health: Recent advancements, challenges and opportunities (2013)The current state of systematic reviews in library and information studies (2015)The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching (2015)Feasibility and desirability of screening search results from Google Search exhaustively for systematic reviews: A cross‐case analysis (2023)The scandal of poor medical research (1994)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Assessing the Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials Examining Psychological Interventions for Pediatric Procedural Pain: Recommendations for Quality Improvement (2009)A quasi-experimental cross-disciplinary evaluation of the impacts of education outside the classroom on pupils’ physical activity, well-being and learning: the TEACHOUT study protocol (2016)Registries and Registration of Clinical Trials (2005)The Latin American Ongoing Clinical Trial Register (LATINREC) (2006)Publication bias in clinical trials of electronic health records (2012)A Nonparametric "Trim and Fill" Method of Accounting for Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis (2000)A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. (2006)NIH clinical trials and publication bias. (1993)Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions (2014)Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts (2018)The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation (1991)Formulating Questions and Locating Primary Studies for Inclusion in Systematic Reviews (1997)Registering Clinical Trials (2003)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1991Publication bias in clinical research3,110 cited
  • 1986Publication bias: the case for an international registry of clinical trials.746 cited
  • 1990Underreporting Research Is Scientific Misconduct552 cited
  • 1993Publication Bias: The Problem That Won't Go Away427 cited
  • 1990Underreporting research is scientific misconduct304 cited

Cited by

  • 2009Missing a critical piece of the pie: simple document search strategies inadequate for systematic reviews86 cited
  • 2001Publishing study protocols: making them visible will improve registration, reporting and recruitment63 cited
  • 2013The evolution of assessing bias in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: celebrating methodological contributions of the Cochrane Collaboration62 cited
  • 2001Evaluation of the usefulness of Internet searches to identify unpublished clinical trials for systematic reviews53 cited
  • 2002A clinical trials register for Europe46 cited
  • 1999Netprints: the next phase in the evolution of biomedical publishing44 cited
  • 2001Using Systematic Reviews and Registers of Ongoing Trials for Scientific and Ethical Trial Design, Monitoring, and Reporting35 cited
  • 2018Nonpublication Rates and Characteristics of Registered Randomized Clinical Trials in Digital Health: Cross-Sectional Analysis32 cited
  • 2007

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Bibliographic study showed improving methodology of meta-analyses published in leading journals 1993–2002
29 cited
  • 2000Current Controlled Trials: an opportunity to help improve the quality of clinical research28 cited
  • 2002Interpreting the evidence27 cited