SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
How to generalize efficacy results of randomized trials: recommendations based on a systematic review of possible approaches
13 references·4 citing·51 second hop
How to generalize efficacy results of randomized trials: recommendations based on a systematic review of possible approaches (2012)How to generalize efficacy results of ran…Randomisation to protect against selection bias in healthcare trials (2011)Randomisation to protect agai…Is a subgroup effect believable? Updating criteria to evaluate the credibility of subgroup analyses (2010)Is a subgroup effect believab…Eligibility Criteria of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in High-Impact General Medical Journals (2007)Eligibility Criteria of Rando…External validity: the neglected dimension in evidence ranking (2006)External validity: the neglec…Checklist for the qualitative evaluation of clinical studies with particular focus on external validity and model validity (2006)Checklist for the qualitative…Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies (2003)Evaluating non-randomised int…Issues in the selection of a summary statistic for meta‐analysis of clinical trials with binary outcomes (2002)Issues in the selection of a …Can we individualize the ‘number needed to treat’? An empirical study of summary effect measures in meta-analyses (2002)Can we individualize the ‘num…Using high quality clinical databases to complement the results of randomised controlled trials: the case of recombinant human activated protein C (2001)Using high quality clinical d…Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)Randomized, Controlled Trials…Users' Guides to the Medical Literature (1998)Users' Guides to the Medical …An empirical study of the effect of the control rate as a predictor of treatment efficacy in meta-analysis of clinical trials (1998)An empirical study of the eff…Users' Guides to the Medical Literature (1994)Users' Guides to the Medical …Project Rebuild the Evidence Base (REB): a method to interpret randomised clinical trials and their meta-analysis to present solid benefit-risk assessments to patients. (2022)Project Rebuild the Evidence …Treatment Effectiveness and the Russo–Williamson Thesis, EBM+, and Bradford Hill's Viewpoints (2021)Treatment Effectiveness and t…Is meta-analysis of RCTs assessing the efficacy of interventions a reliable source of evidence for therapeutic decisions? (2021)Is meta-analysis of RCTs asse…Implementing evidence‐based treatment protocols: Flexibility within fidelity. (2018)Implementing evidence‐based t…Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Assessing the quality of research (2004)Recommendations by Cochrane Review Groups for assessment of the risk of bias in studies (2008)Understanding GRADE: an introduction (2013)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)—Explanation and Elaboration: A Report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force (2013)Use of GRADE for assessment of evidence about prognosis: rating confidence in estimates of event rates in broad categories of patients (2015)Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) 2022 Explanation and Elaboration: A Report of the ISPOR CHEERS II Good Practices Task Force (2022)Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research (1963)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias) (2011)Assessing risk of bias in prevalence studies: modification of an existing tool and evidence of interrater agreement (2012)Users' guides to the medical literature. VI. How to use an overview. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group (1994)Users' Guides to the Medical Literature (1999)Users' Guides to the Medical Literature (1999)Assessing equity in systematic reviews: realising the recommendations of the Commission on Social Determinants of Health (2010)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)External validity of randomised controlled trials: “To whom do the results of this trial apply?” (2005)Delivering affordable cancer care in high-income countries (2011)Best care at lower cost: the path to continuously learning health care in America (2014)ESMO Guidance for Reporting Oncology real-World evidence (GROW) (2023)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)QUANTITATIVE METHODS IN THE REVIEW OF EPIDEMIOLOGIC LITERATURE1 (1987)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Investigating causes of heterogeneity in systematic reviews (2002)Language of publication restrictions in systematic reviews gave different results depending on whether the intervention was conventional or complementary (2005)Investigating clinical heterogeneity in systematic reviews: a methodologic review of guidance in the literature (2012)Meta-analysis in social research (1982)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research. (1994)How to read a paper: Papers that go beyond numbers (qualitative research) (1997)Method Guidelines for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group for Spinal Disorders (1997)Towards systematic reviews that inform health care management and policy-making (2005)Statistical Methods for Examining Heterogeneity and Combining Results from Several Studies in Meta‐Analysis (2001)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Systematic Reviews in Health Care. Meta-analysis in Context. (2002)Recent developments in meta‐analysis (2007)NICE DSU Technical Support Document 2: A Generalised Linear Modelling Framework for Pairwise and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials (2011)Evaluation of inconsistency in networks of interventions (2013)Review papers : The statistical basis of meta-analysis (1993)Summing up evidence: one answer is not always enough (1998)Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context (2000)Reliable change and minimum important difference (MID) proportions facilitated group responsiveness comparisons using individual threshold criteria (2004)Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and risk of suicide: a systematic review of observational studies (2009)The effects of psychotherapies for depression on response, remission, reliable change, and deterioration: A meta‐analysis (2021)Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research (2005)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2000Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs3,561 cited
  • 2003Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies2,905 cited
  • 2007Eligibility Criteria of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in High-Impact General Medical Journals1,056 cited
  • 1994Users' Guides to the Medical Literature813 cited
  • 2010Is a subgroup effect believable? Updating criteria to evaluate the credibility of subgroup analyses805 cited
  • 2002Issues in the selection of a summary statistic for meta‐analysis of clinical trials with binary outcomes660 cited
  • 2011Randomisation to protect against selection bias in healthcare trials439 cited
  • 2002Can we individualize the ‘number needed to treat’? An empirical study of summary effect measures in meta-analyses318 cited
  • 1998Users' Guides to the Medical Literature252 cited
  • 1998An empirical study of the effect of the control rate as a predictor of treatment efficacy in meta-analysis of clinical trials217 cited
  • 2006Checklist for the qualitative evaluation of clinical studies with particular focus on external validity and model validity91 cited
  • 2001Using high quality clinical databases to complement the results of randomised controlled trials: the case of recombinant human activated protein C64 cited
  • 2006External validity: the neglected dimension in evidence ranking57 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Cited by

  • 2018Implementing evidence‐based treatment protocols: Flexibility within fidelity.132 cited
  • 2021Is meta-analysis of RCTs assessing the efficacy of interventions a reliable source of evidence for therapeutic decisions?16 cited
  • 2022Project Rebuild the Evidence Base (REB): a method to interpret randomised clinical trials and their meta-analysis to present solid benefit-risk assessments to patients.15 cited
  • 2021Treatment Effectiveness and the Russo–Williamson Thesis, EBM+, and Bradford Hill's Viewpoints10 cited