SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Peers under pressure
0 references·10 citing·47 second hop
Peers under pressure (2001)Peers under pressureUnderstanding authors' psychological reactions to peer reviews: a text mining approach (2021)Understanding authors' psycho…Anonymous Philosophical Communication (2018)Anonymous Philosophical Commu…Preserving the Quality of Scientific Research: Peer Review of Research Articles (2017)Preserving the Quality of Sci…Communicating science: professional, popular, literary (2010)Communicating science: profes…The Future of Academic Publishing: Application of the Long-Tail Theory (2009)The Future of Academic Publis…The Importance of Resubmitting Rejected Papers (2007)The Importance of Resubmittin…Promoting F.A.I.T.H. in Peer Review: Five Core Attributes of Effective Peer Review (2003)Promoting F.A.I.T.H. in Peer …Peer review of manuscripts: theory and practice (2003)Peer review of manuscripts: t…Accuracy in the Identification of Scholarly and Peer-Reviewed Journals and the Peer-Review Process Across Disciplines (2003)Accuracy in the Identificatio…Peer review, unmasked (2002)Peer review, unmaskedThe Long Revolution (1961)Cognitive development : its cultural and social foundations (1976)Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life (1987)Portraying real science in science communication (2011)WHEN THE EXPERTS ARE UNCERTAIN: SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE AND THE ETHICS OF DEMOCRATIC JUDGMENT (2013)The ethics of scientific communication under uncertainty (2014)Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system (1977)Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)Nepotism and sexism in peer-review (1997)Evaluating the Evaluators (1981)The counting house (2002)Why impact factors don't work for taxonomy (2002)``Circle the Wagons and Defend the Faith'' (2008)The Importance of Encouraging Librarians to Publish in Peer-Reviewed Publications (2012)Rejected papers in academic publishing: Turning negatives into positives to maximize paper acceptance (2024)US and Non-US Submissions (1998)Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers'recommendations: a randomised trial (1999)Subjective Performance and the Value of Blind Evaluation (2011)Submission letters for academic publication: Disciplinary differences and promotional language (2014)Blind Peer Review by Academic Journals (2016)The Effects of Double-Blind versus Single-Blind Reviewing: Experimental Evidence from The American Economic Review (2016)Opening up BMJ peer review (1999)Making Reviewers Visible (2002)The Uses of Argument (2003)A review of the review process: manuscript peer-review in biomedical research (2009)The problem of humiliation in peer review (2014)Ethics in Peer Review of Academic Journal Articles as Perceived by Authors in the Educational Sciences (2018)Measuring the Quality of Editorial Peer Review (2002)Poor-quality medical research: what can journals do? (2002)The reporting of methodological factors in randomized controlled trials and the association with a journal policy to promote adherence to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) checklist (2002)The Art and Politics of Peer Review (2004)Impact factor statistics and publication practice: What can we learn? (2007)Evaluations by Peer Review in Science (2013)Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Editor home bias? (2023)Peer review in health sciences (2002)Conceptions of Truth (2003)Perceptions of Ethical Problems with Scientific Journal Peer Review: An Exploratory Study (2008)Social capital and social support on the web: the case of an internet mother site (2005)Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals (2006)Automated Text Analysis for Consumer Research (2017)Textual features of peer review predict top-cited papers: An interpretable machine learning perspective (2024)Publication rejection among ecologists (2003)Publication and Rejection among Successful Ecologists (2004)Complex systems approach to scientific publication and peer-review system: development of an agent-based model calibrated with empirical journal data (2015)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2002Peer review, unmasked40 cited
  • 2010Communicating science: professional, popular, literary32 cited
  • 2003Accuracy in the Identification of Scholarly and Peer-Reviewed Journals and the Peer-Review Process Across Disciplines23 cited
  • 2003Peer review of manuscripts: theory and practice21 cited
  • 2003Promoting F.A.I.T.H. in Peer Review: Five Core Attributes of Effective Peer Review18 cited
  • 2017Preserving the Quality of Scientific Research: Peer Review of Research Articles15 cited
  • 2007The Importance of Resubmitting Rejected Papers15 cited
  • 2021Understanding authors' psychological reactions to peer reviews: a text mining approach12 cited
  • 2009The Future of Academic Publishing: Application of the Long-Tail Theory11 cited
  • 2018Anonymous Philosophical Communication5 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work