SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Promoting F.A.I.T.H. in Peer Review: Five Core Attributes of Effective Peer Review · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticlePromoting F.A.I.T.H. in Peer Review: Five Core Attributes of Effective Peer Review

Leigh G. Turner2003

Article2003

Promoting F.A.I.T.H. in Peer Review: Five Core Attributes of Effective Peer Review

Leigh G. Turner

18 citations·0/0 files stored·Journal of Academic Ethics

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Publishing and Scholarly Communication Academic Writing and Publishing Academic Publishing and Open Access

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 18 citations exist upstream.

References

2003The Uses of Argument 1999Opening up BMJ peer review 2002Making Reviewers Visible 2002Peer review of statistics in medical research: the other problem 1997Peer review: reform or revolution?1999Evidence on peer review—scientific quality control or smokescreen?1998What makes a good reviewer of manuscripts?1998Freedom and Responsibility in Medical Publication

Cited by

2009A review of the review process: manuscript peer-review in biomedical research 2014The problem of humiliation in peer review 2018Ethics in Peer Review of Academic Journal Articles as Perceived by Authors in the Educational Sciences 2019Discovering the Benefits of Group Peer Review of Submitted Manuscripts

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2015The evolution of peer review as a basis for scientific publication: directional selection towards a robust discipline?review · 3 shared references 2020Open versus blind peer review: is anonymity better than transparency?article · 3 shared references 2003Accuracy in the Identification of Scholarly and Peer-Reviewed Journals and the Peer-Review Process Across Disciplinesarticle · 3 shared references 2010Shifting Power Relations and the Ethics of Journal Peer Reviewarticle · 3 shared references 2001Referees’ Attitudes toward Open Peer Review and Electronic Transmission of Papersarticle · 3 shared references 2007Impact factor statistics and publication practice: What can we learn?article · 3 shared references

Details

Year2003

Typearticle

Published2003-06-01

VenueJournal of Academic Ethics

ISSN-L1570-1727

Languageen

Citations18

Files0 public / 0

ShelfPublishing and Scholarly Communication

Identifiers

doi10.1023/b:jaet.0000006844.09724.98

openalex_workW2082209352

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.