Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Promoting F.A.I.T.H. in Peer Review: Five Core Attributes of Effective Peer Review

9 references·5 citing·41 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2003The Uses of Argument7,099 cited
1999Opening up BMJ peer review191 cited
2002Making Reviewers Visible167 cited
2002Peer review of statistics in medical research: the other problem156 cited
1997Peer review: reform or revolution?113 cited
1999Evidence on peer review—scientific quality control or smokescreen?97 cited
1998What makes a good reviewer of manuscripts?61 cited
1998Freedom and Responsibility in Medical Publication60 cited
2001Peers under pressure43 cited

Cited by

2009A review of the review process: manuscript peer-review in biomedical research18 cited
2014The problem of humiliation in peer review17 cited
2018Ethics in Peer Review of Academic Journal Articles as Perceived by Authors in the Educational Sciences16 cited
2019Discovering the Benefits of Group Peer Review of Submitted Manuscripts15 cited
2015“Peer Review is Melting Our Glaciers”: What Led the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) to Go Astray?8 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work