Effect of Scale on the Links between Walking and Urban Design

Vincent Learnihan · Kimberley P. Van Niel · Billie Giles‐Corti · Matthew William Knuiman

87 citations0/0 files storedGeographical Research

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Urban Transport and Accessibility Urban Design and Spatial Analysis Urban Green Space and Health

Abstract

Studies of the relationship between walking and urban form consistently show that pedestrian-friendly neighbourhoods encourage local walking. However, the geographic scale of measurement of the built environment for developing walkability indices and their relationship with different types of walking (e.g. for transport and recreation) has not been fully examined. In this study, objective measures of the built environment were developed at three geographic scales: suburb, census collection district, and 15 min walk neighbourhood for each participant. Walking for transport and recreation within the neighbourhood was measured using the Neighbourhood Physical Activity Questionnaire. The likelihood of walking at all (yes/no) and as recommended for health benefit (150 min per week) were assessed using logistic regression. The walkability index captured a strong positive relationship between urban form and walking for transport, but found no relationship at any scale for recreational walking. Participants walking for transport and living in high versus low walkable areas were 63% more likely to walk at the suburb scale (odds ratio 1.63; 95% confidence interval 1.22–2.18), twice as likely to walk at the census collection district scale, and nearly three times more likely to walk at the 15 min walk scale (odds ration 2.79; 95% confidence interval 2.09–3.73). The scale at which environmental data are measured influenced the strength of the relationship, showing that the neighbourhood 15 min from home was most predictive of transport walking. This has research and policy implications. Standardised scales across studies would both improve comparability of results and enhance understanding of the influences on walking.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 87 citations exist upstream.

References

1997Travel demand and the 3Ds: Density, diversity, and design 2003Environmental correlates of walking and cycling: Findings from the transportation, urban design, and planning literatures 2002How the built environment affects physical activity 2004Obesity relationships with community design, physical activity, and time spent in cars 1991The Modifiable Areal Unit Problem in Multivariate Statistical Analysis 2005Linking objectively measured physical activity with objectively measured urban form 2002The relative influence of individual, social and physical environment determinants of physical activity 2007The Built Environment and Obesity

Cited by

2013Is walkability associated with a lower cardiometabolic risk?2019How Do Neighbourhood Definitions Influence the Associations between Built Environment and Physical Activity?2014Developing a research and practice tool to measure walkability: a demonstration project 2012The relationship between cluster-analysis derived walkability and local recreational and transportation walking among Canadian adults 2013

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.