References

• 2010Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases1,039 cited
• 2013Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews949 cited
• 2007How Quickly Do Systematic Reviews Go Out of Date? A Survival Analysis837 cited
• 2005Meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized trials: a review of methods used in practice557 cited
• 2009AHRQ Series Paper 5: Grading the strength of a body of evidence when comparing medical interventions—Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and the Effective Health-Care Program512 cited
• 2010Initial National Priorities for Comparative Effectiveness Research391 cited
• 2008AHRQ Series Paper 4: Assessing harms when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health-Care Program184 cited
• 2010EBM, HTA, and CER: Clearing the Confusion169 cited
• 2008Evidence-Based Medicine, Systematic Reviews, and Guidelines in Interventional Pain Management: Part 6. Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Observational Studies167 cited
• 2008Attention should be given to multiplicity issues in systematic reviews138 cited
• 2010Facts, Fallacies, and Politics of Comparative Effectiveness Research: Part I. Basic Considerations110 cited
• 2009AHRQ Series Paper 3: Identifying, selecting, and refining topics for comparative effectiveness systematic reviews: AHRQ and the Effective Health-Care program105 cited
• 2009Comparative Effectiveness — Thinking beyond Medication A versus Medication B