Quality, certification and peer review

Richard Akerman · Bruno Granier · Pritpal S Tamber · Ulrich Pöschl

11 citations0/0 files storedInformation Services & Use

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Publishing and Scholarly Communication scientometrics and bibliometrics research Academic Writing and Publishing

Abstract

Assessing the quality of research is of critical importance.In this article I will discuss various research projects conducted at Elsevier, which help us better understand the attitudes towards peer review and how we might improve this most critical of mechanism for assaying research quality.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 11 citations exist upstream.

References

1971Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalisation, structure and functions of the referee system 2004Interactive journal concept for improved scientific publishing and quality assurance 1990Peer review of the biomedical literature 2006An open, two-stage peer-review journal

Cited by

2016Wissenschaftskommunikation 2.0?

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.