SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Quality, certification and peer review
4 references·1 citing·18 second hop
Quality, certification and peer review (2008)Quality, certification and peer reviewAn open, two-stage peer-review journal (2006)An open, two-stage peer-revie…Interactive journal concept for improved scientific publishing and quality assurance (2004)Interactive journal concept f…Peer review of the biomedical literature (1990)Peer review of the biomedical…Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalisation, structure and functions of the referee system (1971)Patterns of evaluation in sci…Wissenschaftskommunikation 2.0? (2016)Wissenschaftskommunikation 2.…The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)Everything You Need to Know About Peer Review — The Good, The Bad and The Ugly (2019)Challenges in peer review: how to guarantee the quality and transparency of the editorial process in scientific journals (2023)Los desafíos de la revisión por pares: cómo garantizar la calidad y transparencia del proceso editorial de las revistas científicas (2023)The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. (1994)Diffusion of innovations. (2003)Diffusion of Innovations 1 (2019)The journal is dead, long live the journal (2007)The Air We Breathe: A Critical Look at Practices and Alternatives in the Peer-Review Process (2009)The problem of humiliation in peer review (2014)Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system (1977)Factors Influencing Publication of Research Results (1992)Shall we Really do it Again? The Powerful Concept of Replication is Neglected in the Social Sciences (2009)The manuscript reviewing process: Empirical research on review requests, review sequences, and decision rules in peer review (2009)Closed versus open reviewing of journal manuscripts: how far do comments differ in language use? (2011)Big Data, data integrity, and the fracturing of the control zone (2014)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1971Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalisation, structure and functions of the referee system790 cited
  • 2004Interactive journal concept for improved scientific publishing and quality assurance85 cited
  • 1990Peer review of the biomedical literature29 cited
  • 2006An open, two-stage peer-review journal22 cited

Cited by

  • 2016Wissenschaftskommunikation 2.0?6 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work