Analyses of Selected LHX Mission Functions: Implications for Operator Workload and System Automation Goals

J. H. McCracken · Theodore B. Aldrich

185 citations0/0 files stored

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Human-Automation Interaction and Safety Military Strategy and Technology Ergonomics and Human Factors

Abstract

Twenty-nine Light Helicopter Experimental (LHX) scout and attack mission segments were analyzed for excessive workload. Each of the mission segments was broken down into critical flight control, support, and mission functions, and positioned on a mission timeline. Functional analyses were performed by identifying the critical performance elements with their man- machine interface. Sensory, cognitive, and psychomotor workload and durations were estimated for each performance element.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 185 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2013Mental workload measurement for emergency operating procedures in digital nuclear power plants 2000Mental Workload and ARL Workload Modeling Tools 2016Workload profiles: A continuous measure of mental workload 1989The Development and Application of Models to Predict Operator Workload During System Design 2014A structured method for the traffic dispatcher error behavior analysis in metro accident investigation 2021A fault tree-based approach for aviation risk analysis considering mental workload overload 2013Comparison of task complexity measures for emergency operating procedures: Convergent validity and predictive validity 2006Risk assessment and human performance modelling: the need for an integrated systems approach

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.