SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
What is the future of peer review? Why is there fraud in science? Is plagiarism out of control? Why do scientists do bad things? Is it all a case of: "all that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing"?
16 references·16 citing·31 second hopsampled
What is the future of peer review? Why is there fraud in science? Is plagiarism out of control? Why do scientists do bad things? Is it all a case of: "all that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing"? (2007)What is the future of peer review? Why is…The Republican war on science (2006)The Republican war on scienceThe History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)The History and Meaning of th…Research Misconduct, Retraction, and Cleansing the Medical Literature: Lessons from the Poehlman Case (2006)Research Misconduct, Retracti…Effect of Blinded Peer Review on Abstract Acceptance (2006)Effect of Blinded Peer Review…Toward alternative metrics of journal impact: A comparison of download and citation data (2005)Toward alternative metrics of…Scientists behaving badly (2005)Scientists behaving badlyAn index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)An index to quantify an indiv…A Review of the Evidence for the Efficacy and Safety of Trazodone in Insomnia (2005)A Review of the Evidence for …The history of the peer-review process (2002)The history of the peer-revie…Journal impact factor: a brief review. (1999)Journal impact factor: a brie…Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Why the impact factor of jour…Science in Russia and the Soviet Union: A Short History (1994)Science in Russia and the Sov…Cryptomnesia: Delineating inadvertent plagiarism. (1989)Cryptomnesia: Delineating ina…Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy (1979)Hitchhiker's Guide to the Gal…The Sacred Wood: Essays on Poetry and Criticism (1920)The Sacred Wood: Essays on Po…A constant error in psychological ratings. (1920)A constant error in psycholog…Research ethics dilemma in higher education: Impact of internet access, ethical controls, and teaching factors on student plagiarism (2021)Research ethics dilemma in hi…Academics and the Field of Academic Publishing: Challenges and Approaches (2019)Academics and the Field of Ac…Internal and External Factors of Plagiarism: Evidence from Chinese Public Sector Universities (2018)Internal and External Factors…Is Biomedical Research Protected from Predatory Reviewers? (2017)Is Biomedical Research Protec…Blinding applicants in a first-stage peer-review process of biomedical research grants: An observational study (2017)Blinding applicants in a firs…Academic Primer Series: Key Papers About Peer Review (2017)Academic Primer Series: Key P…From Gutenberg to Open Science: An Unfulfilled Odyssey (2016)From Gutenberg to Open Scienc…‘Peer review’ for scientific manuscripts: Emerging issues, potential threats, and possible remedies (2016)‘Peer review’ for scientific …Plagiarism in medical scientific research (2015)Plagiarism in medical scienti…Current Dynamics of Scholarly Publishing (2015)Current Dynamics of Scholarly…O processo de revisão por pares: uma revisão integrativa de literatura (2012)O processo de revisão por par…Ethics in writing: Learning to stay away from plagiarism and scientific misconduct (2011)Ethics in writing: Learning t…Fraud or flawed: adverse impact of fabricated or poor quality research (2010)Fraud or flawed: adverse impa…The Air We Breathe: A Critical Look at Practices and Alternatives in the Peer-Review Process (2009)The Air We Breathe: A Critica…Is Peer Review Censorship? (2009)Is Peer Review Censorship?Discussing plagiarism in Latin American science (2009)Discussing plagiarism in Lati…Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact (2001)A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases (2013)A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)Chance and Consensus in Peer Review (1981)Publishing by—and for?—the Numbers (1990)A review of theory and practice in scientometrics (2015)Antecedent genre as rhetorical constraint (1975)How Stories Make Us Feel: Toward an Embodied Narratology (2011)Creating shared value: A systematic review, synthesis and integrative perspective (2021)A Widening Gap: Republican and Democratic Views on Climate Change (2008)Swimming Against the Current: The Rise of a Hidden Developmental State in the United States (2008)The organisation of denial: Conservative think tanks and environmental scepticism (2008)Peer Review in Scientific Publications: Benefits, Critiques, & A Survival Guide. (2014)What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)Misinformation in and about science (2021)Forming impressions of personality. (1946)The halo effect: Evidence for unconscious alteration of judgments. (1977)Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. (1995)Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data (2010)Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Inferential Statistics as Descriptive Statistics: There Is No Replication Crisis if We Don’t Expect Replication (2019)Impact factor: a valid measure of journal quality? (2003)A Principal Component Analysis of 39 Scientific Impact Measures (2009)Application of bibliometrics in medicine: a historical bibliometrics analysis (2020)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? (2015)bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis (2017)Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches (1995)WHO NEEDS CULTURAL INTERMEDIARIES? (2002)Knowledge sharing: context, confusion and controversy (2003)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2005An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output11,612 cited
  • 2006The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor2,765 cited
  • 1997Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research2,444 cited
  • 1920A constant error in psychological ratings.2,162 cited
  • 2005Scientists behaving badly1,089 cited
  • 1999Journal impact factor: a brief review.760 cited
  • 1920The Sacred Wood: Essays on Poetry and Criticism613 cited
  • 1979Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy596 cited
  • 2006The Republican war on science522 cited
  • 2002The history of the peer-review process445 cited
  • 2005A Review of the Evidence for the Efficacy and Safety of Trazodone in Insomnia308 cited
  • 2006Effect of Blinded Peer Review on Abstract Acceptance250 cited
  • 2005Toward alternative metrics of journal impact: A comparison of download and citation data210 cited
  • 2006Research Misconduct, Retraction, and Cleansing the Medical Literature: Lessons from the Poehlman Case199 cited
  • 1989Cryptomnesia: Delineating inadvertent plagiarism.153 cited
  • 1994

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Science in Russia and the Soviet Union: A Short History
142 cited

Cited by

  • 2009The Air We Breathe: A Critical Look at Practices and Alternatives in the Peer-Review Process85 cited
  • 2010Fraud or flawed: adverse impact of fabricated or poor quality research62 cited
  • 2009Discussing plagiarism in Latin American science57 cited
  • 2015Plagiarism in medical scientific research48 cited
  • 2021Research ethics dilemma in higher education: Impact of internet access, ethical controls, and teaching factors on student plagiarism36 cited
  • 2011Ethics in writing: Learning to stay away from plagiarism and scientific misconduct34 cited
  • 2018Internal and External Factors of Plagiarism: Evidence from Chinese Public Sector Universities34 cited
  • 2009Is Peer Review Censorship?32 cited
  • 2017Academic Primer Series: Key Papers About Peer Review24 cited
  • 2016From Gutenberg to Open Science: An Unfulfilled Odyssey21 cited
  • 2012O processo de revisão por pares: uma revisão integrativa de literatura21 cited
  • 2019Academics and the Field of Academic Publishing: Challenges and Approaches21 cited
  • 2017Is Biomedical Research Protected from Predatory Reviewers?21 cited
  • 2016‘Peer review’ for scientific manuscripts: Emerging issues, potential threats, and possible remedies18 cited
  • 2017Blinding applicants in a first-stage peer-review process of biomedical research grants: An observational study16 cited
  • 2015Current Dynamics of Scholarly Publishing16 cited