SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Open Science: One Term, Five Schools of Thought
2 references·16 citing·53 second hop
Open Science: One Term, Five Schools of Thought (2013)Open Science: One Term, Five Schools of T…The Politics of Talk (2006)The Politics of TalkCitizen science: a study of people, expertise and sustainable development (1996)Citizen science: a study of p…Philosophy of Open Science (2023)Philosophy of Open ScienceHow to improve scientific peer review: Four schools of thought (2023)How to improve scientific pee…Dynamics of cumulative advantage and threats to equity in open science: a scoping review (2022)Dynamics of cumulative advant…Bridging Neurodiversity and Open Scholarship: How Shared Values Can Guide Best Practices for Research Integrity, Social Justice, and Principled Education (2022)Bridging Neurodiversity and O…Towards wide-scale adoption of open science practices: The role of open science communities (2021)Towards wide-scale adoption o…The fall of the innovation empire and its possible rise through open science (2021)The fall of the innovation em…Open Science: the Very Idea (2021)Open Science: the Very IdeaEcosystem effectuation: creating new value through open innovation during a pandemic (2021)Ecosystem effectuation: creat…“Garbage in, garbage out” revisited: What do machine learning application papers report about human-labeled training data? (2021)“Garbage in, garbage out” rev…Transparency in artificial intelligence (2020)Transparency in artificial in…Tackling COVID-19 through Responsible AI Innovation: Five Steps in the Right Direction (2020)Tackling COVID-19 through Res…Garbage in, garbage out? (2020)Garbage in, garbage out?Science as behaviour: Using a behaviour change approach to increase uptake of open science (2019)Science as behaviour: Using a…Co-shaping the Future in Quadruple Helix Innovation Systems: Uncovering Public Preferences toward Participatory Research and Innovation (2019)Co-shaping the Future in Quad…Open Education Science (2018)Open Education ScienceWhat is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)What is open peer review? A s…Breaking the Waves in Science Studies (2003)Developing a framework for responsible innovation (2013)“Citizen Science”? Rethinking Science and Public Participation (2018)Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change (2018)The history of the peer-review process (2002)Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals (2006)Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals (2006)The evaluation of scholarship in academic promotion and tenure processes: Past, present, and future (2018)AI-assisted peer review (2021)Open science saves lives: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic (2021)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Both Questionable and Open Research Practices Are Prevalent in Education Research (2021)From old school to open science: The implications of new research norms for educational psychology and beyond (2021)A Systematic Literature Review of Game-Based Assessment Studies: Trends and Challenges (2022)Open Innovation: The New Imperative For Creating and Profiting From Technology (2004)Co-creation and the new landscapes of design (2008)'Mode 3' and 'Quadruple Helix': toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem (2009)From regional innovation systems to global innovation hubs: Evidence of a Quadruple Helix from an emerging economy (2020)Voluntary environmental regulation and urban innovation: Evidence from low-carbon pilot cities program in China (2021)The rise of GovTech: Trojan horse or blessing in disguise? A research agenda (2022)The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. (1968)Professional Vision (1994)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Data and its (dis)contents: A survey of dataset development and use in machine learning research (2020)Language (Technology) is Power: A Critical Survey of “Bias” in NLP (2020)An Overview of Artificial Intelligence Ethics (2022)How the machine ‘thinks’: Understanding opacity in machine learning algorithms (2016)AI4People—An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society: Opportunities, Risks, Principles, and Recommendations (2018)The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines (2019)AI governance: themes, knowledge gaps and future agendas (2023)Artificial Intelligence in Advertising: Advancements, Challenges, and Ethical Considerations in Targeting, Personalization, Content Creation, and Ad Optimization (2023)Artificial intelligence for literature reviews: opportunities and challenges (2024)Diffusion of innovations (2003)1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility (2016)Diffusion of Innovations 1 (2019)Open science (2023)The replication crisis has led to positive structural, procedural, and community changes (2023)Heterogeneity in effect size estimates (2024)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Indicators of research quality, quantity, openness, and responsibility in institutional review, promotion, and tenure policies across seven countries (2022)The APC-barrier and its effect on stratification in open access publishing (2023)The societal impact of Open Science: a scoping review (2024)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)Epistemic Injustice (2007)Open Science at the generative AI turn: An exploratory analysis of challenges and opportunities (2024)The Social Dimensions of Scientific Knowledge (2024)Geographical and disciplinary coverage of open access journals: OpenAlex, Scopus, and WoS (2025)Focus Groups in Social Research (2001)Reframing Public Policy (2003)“Opening Up” and “Closing Down” (2007)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1996Citizen science: a study of people, expertise and sustainable development1,736 cited
  • 2006The Politics of Talk679 cited

Cited by

  • 2020Transparency in artificial intelligence458 cited
  • 2017What is open peer review? A systematic review453 cited
  • 2019Co-shaping the Future in Quadruple Helix Innovation Systems: Uncovering Public Preferences toward Participatory Research and Innovation188 cited
  • 2020Garbage in, garbage out?167 cited
  • 2023Philosophy of Open Science161 cited
  • 2022Dynamics of cumulative advantage and threats to equity in open science: a scoping review142 cited
  • 2021Towards wide-scale adoption of open science practices: The role of open science communities110 cited
  • 2018Open Education Science107 cited
  • 2021“Garbage in, garbage out” revisited: What do machine learning application papers report about human-labeled training data?97 cited
  • 2020Tackling COVID-19 through Responsible AI Innovation: Five Steps in the Right Direction94 cited
  • 2022Bridging Neurodiversity and Open Scholarship: How Shared Values Can Guide Best Practices for Research Integrity, Social Justice, and Principled Education90 cited
  • 2021The fall of the innovation empire and its possible rise through open science89 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2021Ecosystem effectuation: creating new value through open innovation during a pandemic88 cited
  • 2019Science as behaviour: Using a behaviour change approach to increase uptake of open science81 cited
  • 2023How to improve scientific peer review: Four schools of thought71 cited
  • 2021Open Science: the Very Idea67 cited