SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Using the standard error of measurement to identify important changes on the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire
7 references·2 citing·33 second hop
Using the standard error of measurement to identify important changes on the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (2002)Using the standard error of measurement t…Linking Clinical Relevance and Statistical significance in Evaluating Intra-Individual Changes in Health-Related Quality of Life (1999)Linking Clinical Relevance an…Further Evidence Supporting an SEM-Based Criterion for Identifying Meaningful Intra-Individual Changes in Health-Related Quality of Life (1999)Further Evidence Supporting a…Interpreting treatment effects in randomised trials (1998)Interpreting treatment effect…Methodological problems in the retrospective computation of responsiveness to change: The lesson of Cronbach (1997)Methodological problems in th…Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? (1995)Individual-patient monitoring…Determining a minimal important change in a disease-specific quality of life questionnaire (1994)Determining a minimal importa…Measurement of health status (1989)Measurement of health statusGeneral anaesthesia and day‐case patient anxiety (2010)General anaesthesia and day‐c…Standard error of measurement as a valid alternative to minimally important difference for evaluating the magnitude of changes in patient-reported outcomes measures (2007)Standard error of measurement…The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. (1992)The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) (1992)SF-36 health survey: Manual and interpretation guide (2003)Minimal changes in health status questionnaires: distinction between minimally detectable change and minimally important change (2006)A point of minimal important difference (MID): a critique of terminology and methods (2011)Sensitivity to change and minimal clinically important difference of the 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire (GAD-7) (2020)A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey (1996)A taxonomy for responsiveness (2001)Many faces of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID): a literature review and directions for future research (2002)Is the standard SF-12 Health Survey valid and equivalent for a Chinese population? (2005)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. (1991)Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. (1991)Clinically meaningful change: False positives in the estimation of individual change. (2014)The two disciplines of scientific psychology. (1957)Is a single-item visual analogue scale as valid, reliable and responsive as multi-item scales in measuring quality of life? (2004)Estimation of minimally important differences in EQ-5D utility and VAS scores in cancer (2007)An Assessment of Clinically Useful Measures of the Consequences of Treatment (1988)Estimating clinically significant differences in quality of life outcomes (2005)Minimally important change determined by a visual method integrating an anchor-based and a distribution-based approach (2006)The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) (1993)Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: Attributes and review criteria (2002)The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: A clarification of its content (2010)The Pittsburgh sleep quality index as a screening tool for sleep dysfunction in clinical and non-clinical samples: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2015)The MOS Short-form General Health Survey (1988)Interpretation of Changes in Health-related Quality of Life (2003)Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires (2006)Influence of gender and anaesthesia type on day surgery anxiety (2011)Melatonin for pre- and postoperative anxiety in adults (2015)Melatonin for preoperative and postoperative anxiety in adults (2020)Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials. (1998)Methods to Explain the Clinical Significance of Health Status Measures (2002)Comparison of the minimally important difference for two health state utility measures: EQ-5D and SF-6D (2005)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1989Measurement of health status4,979 cited
  • 1995Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate?2,206 cited
  • 1994Determining a minimal important change in a disease-specific quality of life questionnaire1,824 cited
  • 1999Further Evidence Supporting an SEM-Based Criterion for Identifying Meaningful Intra-Individual Changes in Health-Related Quality of Life861 cited
  • 1999Linking Clinical Relevance and Statistical significance in Evaluating Intra-Individual Changes in Health-Related Quality of Life569 cited
  • 1997Methodological problems in the retrospective computation of responsiveness to change: The lesson of Cronbach524 cited
  • 1998Interpreting treatment effects in randomised trials516 cited

Cited by

  • 2010General anaesthesia and day‐case patient anxiety110 cited
  • 2007Standard error of measurement as a valid alternative to minimally important difference for evaluating the magnitude of changes in patient-reported outcomes measures77 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work