SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Dashboard Shelves Open access My library Inbox Notes Write Learn Alerts

More

Ask your library Notifications Quick cite Review

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Methods to Explain the Clinical Significance of Health Status Measures · Study

ReviewMethods to Explain the Clinical Significance of Health Status Measures

Gordon Henry Guyatt2002

Review2002

Methods to Explain the Clinical Significance of Health Status Measures

Gordon Henry Guyatt · David Osoba · Albert W. Wu · Kathleen W. Wyrwich · Geoffrey R. Norman

1,505 citations·0/0 files stored·Mayo Clinic Proceedings

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life Psychometric Methodologies and Testing Health Education and Validation

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 1,505 citations exist upstream.

References

1989Measurement of health status 1981The Sickness Impact Profile: Development and Final Revision of a Health Status Measure 1993Measuring Health-Related Quality of Life 1989Effect Sizes for Interpreting Changes in Health Status 1996Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials 1995Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate?1994Determining a minimal important change in a disease-specific quality of life questionnaire

Cited by

2003Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations 2005Comparison of the minimally important difference for two health state utility measures: EQ-5D and SF-6D 2003Defining clinically meaningful change in health-related quality of life 2005El Cuestionario de Salud SF-36 español: una década de experiencia y nuevos desarrollos 2011A point of minimal important difference (MID): a critique of terminology and methods 2008Recommendations on Evidence Needed to Support Measurement Equivalence between Electronic and Paper-Based Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures: ISPOR ePRO Good Research Practices Task Force Report

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

1998Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials.article · 5 shared references 2003Defining clinically meaningful change in health-related quality of lifearticle · 5 shared references 2005Estimating clinically significant differences in quality of life outcomesarticle · 5 shared references 2002Patient-Reported Outcomes: The Example of Health-Related Quality of Life—a European Guidance Document for the Improved Integration of Health-Related Quality of Life Assessment in the Drug Regulatory Processarticle · 5 shared references 1999Assessing Quality of Life in Clinical Researchreview · 5 shared references 1999Further Evidence Supporting an SEM-Based Criterion for Identifying Meaningful Intra-Individual Changes in Health-Related Quality of Lifearticle · 4 shared references

Details

Year2002

Typereview

Published2002-04-01

VenueMayo Clinic Proceedings

ISSN-L0025-6196

Languageen

Citations1,505

Files0 public / 0

ShelfHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life

Identifiers

doi10.4065/77.4.371

openalex_workW1965522233

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.

2006Responsiveness and minimal important differences for patient reported outcomes

2005Estimating clinically significant differences in quality of life outcomes