References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

• 2012Are Peer Reviewers Encouraged to Use Reporting Guidelines? A Survey of 116 Health Research Journals200 cited
• 2014Impact of peer review on reports of randomised trials published in open peer review journals: retrospective before and after study103 cited
• 2010Technical assessment and evaluation of environmental models and software: Letter to the Editor93 cited
• 2013The Handbook of Journal Publishing87 cited
• 2010The ethics of scholarly peer review: a review of the literature84 cited
• 2016Recent trends in academic journal growth77 cited
• 2010Quality and Peer Review of Research: An Adjudicating Role for Editors73 cited
• 2007Peer review as professional responsibility: A quality control system only as good as the participants60 cited
• 2009The luck of the referee draw: the effect of exchanging reviews51 cited
• 2009A content analysis of referees’ comments: how do comments on manuscripts rejected by a high-impact journal and later published in either a low- or high-impact journal differ?47 cited
• 2012A label for peer‐reviewed books39 cited
• 2010Is interactive open access publishing able to identify high-impact submissions? A study on the predictive validity of Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics by using percentile rank classes39 cited
• 2009Citation speed as a measure to predict the attention an article receives: An investigation of the validity of editorial decisions at Angewandte Chemie International Edition