Mapping the field: theories of nationalism and the ethnosymbolic approach

Abstract

To be fully understood, the ethnosymbolic approach, developed by Anthony D. Smith, must be placed in the context of a larger body of literature on nations and nationalism. Two streams of thought are particularly important here: instrumentalism as opposed to primordialism, and modernism as opposed to perennialism. This chapter will explore those theories with which Smith has most oft engaged, placing his own approach within a larger cross-disciplinary context. The scope of this volume compels me to be highly selective: I will only deal with those theories with which Smith has most persistently interacted. Th e reader will not find here much about other theories like rational choice, which still dominates US academia. The chapter will conclude with an exploration of the limits of ethnosymbolism as a tool for interpreting current events and conflicts.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 38 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.