SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Use of double‐blind peer review to increase author diversity · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleUse of double‐blind peer review to increase author diversity

Emily S. Darling2014

Article2014

Use of double‐blind peer review to increase author diversity

Emily S. Darling

68 citations·0/0 files stored·Conservation Biology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Publishing and Scholarly Communication Academic Writing and Publishing Psychology Research and Bibliometrics

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 68 citations exist upstream.

References

2012Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students 2000Orchestrating Impartiality: The Impact of “Blind” Auditions on Female Musicians 2013Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science 1997Nepotism and sexism in peer-review 2011Understanding current causes of women's underrepresentation in science 2007Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authors 2001Testing and adjusting for publication bias 2006Gender Differences in Patenting in the Academic Life Sciences

Cited by

2020Promotion of Women Physicians in Academic Medicine 2022The impact of double-blind peer review on gender bias in scientific publishing: a systematic review 2017The peer review gap: A longitudinal case study of gendered publishing and occupational patterns in a female-rich discipline, Western North America (1974–2016)2019The proportion of male and female editors in women’s health journals: A critical analysis and review of the sex gap,2021Gender Gap in Neurology Research Authorship (1946–2020)

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2023Exploring Gender Bias in Six Key Domains of Academic Science: An Adversarial Collaborationarticle · 8 shared references 2017Men ask more questions than women at a scientific conferencearticle · 7 shared references 2020Research performance and age explain less than half of the gender pay gap in New Zealand universitiesarticle · 7 shared references 2021Gender-equal funding rates conceal unequal evaluationsarticle · 7 shared references 2016Blind Peer Review by Academic Journalschapter · 7 shared references 2021Men, women and STEM: Why the differences and what should be done?article · 6 shared references

Details

Year2014

Typearticle

Published2014-07-04

VenueConservation Biology

ISSN-L0888-8892

Languageen

Citations68

Files0 public / 0

ShelfPublishing and Scholarly Communication

Identifiers

doi10.1111/cobi.12333

openalex_workW1524825687

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.

2018The Role of Gender in Publication in The Journal of Pediatrics 2015-2016: Equal Reviews, Unequal Opportunities

2017A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review

2021Gender disparity in critical care publications: a novel Female First Author Index