SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authors · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleDouble-blind review favours increased representation of female authors

Amber E Budden2007

Article2007

Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authors

Amber E Budden · Tom Tregenza · Lonnie W. Aarssen · Julia Koricheva · Roosa Leimu · Christopher J. Lortie

551 citations·0/0 files stored·Trends in Ecology & Evolution

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Psychology Research and Bibliometrics Publishing and Scholarly Communication scientometrics and bibliometrics research

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 551 citations exist upstream.

References

1997Nepotism and sexism in peer-review 2001Testing and adjusting for publication bias 1998US and Non-US Submissions 1998Effect of Blinding and Unmasking on the Quality of Peer Review

Cited by

2021Gender, Race and Parenthood Impact Academic Productivity During the COVID-19 Pandemic: From Survey to Action 2013Implicit Bias, Stereotype Threat, and Women in Philosophy 2022Responsible Conduct of Research 2012Leaks in the pipeline: separating demographic inertia from ongoing gender differences in academia 2019Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented groups in STEM 2023Exploring Gender Bias in Six Key Domains of Academic Science: An Adversarial Collaboration 2021Gendered citation practices in the field of communication 2021Men, women and STEM: Why the differences and what should be done?

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2014Use of double‐blind peer review to increase author diversityarticle · 3 shared references 2000A avaliação da ciência e a revisão por pares: passado e presente. Como será o futuro?article · 3 shared references 2016Efficacy of Double-Blind Peer Review in an Imaging Subspecialty Journalarticle · 3 shared references 1998Peer Review in Pragueeditorial · 3 shared references 2016Blind Peer Review by Academic Journalschapter · 3 shared references 2001Testing and adjusting for publication biasreview · 2 shared references

Details

Year2007

Typearticle

Published2007-11-27

VenueTrends in Ecology & Evolution

ISSN-L0169-5347

Languageen

Citations551

Files0 public / 0

ShelfPsychology Research and Bibliometrics

Identifiers

doi10.1016/j.tree.2007.07.008

openalex_workW2017899036

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.