Framing effects and rationality

Abstract

Abstract This chapter demonstrates how the pragmatics of natural language can explain many apparent biases of ‘framing’ in reasoning. It explains that the way in which a problem is expressed carries a great deal of information, e.g. about underlying beliefs and values — and that these influence reasoners in systematic ways, although the formulation of a problem has typically been viewed as irrelevant to its solution. Thus, many ‘framing effects’ may arise, in part, because of the inadequacy of normative models that ignore the crucial informational differences between frames.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 65 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.